Update tools and datasets#529
Conversation
- removed the statistics for number of files and size (often not verifiable, incorrect and hard to keep updated) - split the resources into categories, somewhat similar to the tools section
motivated by the mention of zarrs in ome#525
Automated Review URLs |
|
last commits |
|
This pull request has been mentioned on Image.sc Forum. There might be relevant details there: https://forum.image.sc/t/ngff-weekly-dev-update-thread/110810/107 |
|
Hi @lubianat, I just read your post on image.sc and thought I'd suggest adding multiview-stitcher under "Other tools and libraries". Disclaimer: I'm the main developer of the tool.
Thank you :) |
Co-authored-by: m-albert <marvin.albert@gmail.com>
|
@m-albert thanks! I added you as a co-author (after some struggle), hopefully that is okay |
|
@lubianat Amazing, thank you Tiago 🙏 |
|
This pull request has been mentioned on Image.sc Forum. There might be relevant details there: |
Also adds mentions of BIDS (ome#514), Zowser, HuggingFace Hub, the thumbnails convention, RO-Crate and BioCroissant.
|
maybe the bat-signal @ome/ngff-docs works? |
|
In some instances I think it would be nice to directly link to the actual project, i.e., link to biofile finder rather than its gh page? |
Did not ping me on github notifications, but sent me an email notification. Arguably a me problem. |
|
Rendering libraries table in Tools is broken Otherwise thanks for doing the work to keep this up to date! |
|
Thanks all! Nice that the ping worked, even if in unexpected ways for some. I'll fix the formating issues
on that @jo-mueller, I agree generally. I do have a secret plan of scraping those github ids to get some metrics, I'll see if I can figure out a way to link both in a clean way. I think having repository + docpage/website can work cleanly. I'll give it a shot |


This PR addresses documentation gaps outlined in multiple issues
(1) The
datapage is restructured in significant ways:Data resources are now categorized, similarly to the tools page
There are small paragraphs describing the sets of resources, as well as a general introduction
Information on size and number of OME-Zarr files in each resource is removed (it is unmaintainable and often hard/impossible to verify). Without a way to check it, there is a risk of misinforming the reader and the numbers get brittle. Some of them were clearly outdated.
(2) A new
ecosystempage is created, covering the projects that did not fit ontoolsor data`(3) The PR is also collecting new tools and resources, so they are not spread in many small PRs (cited in the commits individually).
and
(4) it sets the OME logo as a favicon (closes #532)
This PR supersedes
Points to clear out:
as this ended up being somewhat large, cc @ome/ngff-docs