Skip to content

fix: talk modal z-index#8607

Open
GVodyanov wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
fix/talk-modal-z-index
Open

fix: talk modal z-index#8607
GVodyanov wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
fix/talk-modal-z-index

Conversation

@GVodyanov

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Fix edit simple modal overlapping the talk modal

🤖 AI (if applicable)

  • The content of this PR was partly or fully generated using AI

@GVodyanov GVodyanov self-assigned this Jul 16, 2026
@GVodyanov GVodyanov added the 3. to review Waiting for reviews label Jul 16, 2026
Signed-off-by: Grigory V <scratchx@gmx.com>
@GVodyanov
GVodyanov force-pushed the fix/talk-modal-z-index branch from 9ed80d2 to 0b8c4c2 Compare July 16, 2026 12:24
Comment thread css/app-modal.scss
}

.modal-mask.add-talk-modal {
z-index: 10000 !important;

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

why 10k and how did this regress?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Either this regressed or #8064 never worked. I'm challenging this because the force z-indexes are a code smell.
Let's find a scaling solution without monkey patches.

Edit simple is probably too high on the z-index. It should be below the standard NcModal as I can't think of a setup where it would be above.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I am going to say it was working in #8064 and broke when the anchor point was changed in #8533

@codecov

codecov Bot commented Jul 16, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.

📢 Thoughts on this report? Let us know!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

3. to review Waiting for reviews

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants