Route memories to saved project workspaces and simplify agent setup - #239
Coding-Dev-Tools wants to merge 35 commits into
Conversation
…plans with included Jev System 1
Codex Review SummaryThis comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHubYour team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings. |
…test before promotion
![chatgpt-codex-connector[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/1144995?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: 6b0537cea4
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: 3af569ca27
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: 4fd41bc43e
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
…ures npm published three advisories after this stack last passed CI, failing both Pi extension jobs introduced by the full development-tree audit: - fast-uri <=3.1.7 and ip-address <=10.7.0 are production dependencies of the MCP SDK. Update the Pi lockfile to fast-uri 3.1.8 and ip-address 10.7.2. - brace-expansion <=5.0.11 exists only inside the Pi coding agent used as the CI test host. That package ships its own npm-shrinkwrap.json, so npm overrides cannot replace it, and no Pi release (through 0.99.1) has a fixed lockfile yet. Production dependencies stay strictly audited. Development advisories still fail, except those confined to the test host's own lockfile, which are reported as warnings until a fixed host can be adopted. The step now runs under bash on both runners. On Windows the default pwsh wrapper reported only the final command's exit code, so a failing npm ci, verify or integration run was hidden whenever the audit passed. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_014ksPGXPZQTikJYpaGHa6R6
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_014ksPGXPZQTikJYpaGHa6R6
|
You have reached your Codex usage limits for code reviews. You can see your limits in the Codex usage dashboard. |
1 similar comment
|
You have reached your Codex usage limits for code reviews. You can see your limits in the Codex usage dashboard. |
|
You have reached your Codex usage limits for code reviews. You can see your limits in the Codex usage dashboard. |
1 similar comment
|
You have reached your Codex usage limits for code reviews. You can see your limits in the Codex usage dashboard. |
|
You have reached your Codex usage limits for code reviews. You can see your limits in the Codex usage dashboard. |
1 similar comment
|
You have reached your Codex usage limits for code reviews. You can see your limits in the Codex usage dashboard. |
2 participants
Agents now follow saved project-to-workspace mappings and inherit an authorized session destination when no workspace is supplied. Responses identify the selected destination. Command Code's SessionStart hook follows the nearest Git repository, and a previewed selective-move workflow organizes mixed workspaces while retaining history and workspace permissions.
Relocation policy uses domain operations declared in the core storage protocol. The SQLite adapter owns traversal and writes, bounds materialization with SQL limits, and preserves caller-owned transaction rollback. A 500-memory move uses 501 parameters, remaining compatible with SQLite's older 999-variable limit. An independent in-memory adapter exercises the same policy without a database connection.
The updater regression proves descendant cleanup with a real post-return probe. CodeQL runs for stacked
codex/**PR bases, and the Pi development-host dependency audit includes the patched WebSocket client.Stack: #238 → this PR → #240. All 29 required/current GitHub checks passed at
e00581e517061504f26f850ff9acc7cf2db82105; no unresolved review conversations remain.Validation for the current source:
These selections overlap. Earlier updater, browser and installed-client checks are retained in the PR history; they are not substituted for current-head CI. No release, deployment or provider call is included.