Skip to content

RAL-179: a Chrome segfault at start gets the one stated retry; a teardown crash is said - #266

Merged
Castor-o7 merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
ral-179/chrome-crash
Nov 14, 2026
Merged

Castor-o7 merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
ral-179/chrome-crash

Conversation

@Castor-o7

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

RAL-179, assigned by the watchman, from the lamplighter's third Chrome crash on Murph (2026-11-14 05:29:59, SIGSEGV in /app/extra/chrome via zypak→libsystemd, during ci-local's check of 90de3d3, which passed and logged nothing of it).

  • At start: a segfault (139, or SIGSEGV) gets RAL-160's one stated retry, with Chrome's stderr kept in retried_after_abort. A second crash fails ("Chrome crashed at start twice"), so a Chrome that crashes every time still fails. The retry stays one.
  • At teardown: when Chrome is closed and the launcher's exit is a crash, one stderr line says so, with the end of what Chrome said. The result stands.
  • coredumpctl: each Chrome core it lists since the run began is said with its time, pid and signal. It's named as this run's when the pid was one of the run's processes (by profile), and otherwise as perhaps a run alongside. Observed only.
  • Logs: tests/web.rs carries those lines to the test's own stderr, so ci-local's log has them even on a pass.
  • Tests: a segfault retried and a second failing; a teardown crash with a stand-in coredumpctl (RALLY_BROWSER_COREDUMPCTL).

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

Castor-o7 and others added 2 commits November 14, 2026 05:50
…down crash is said

From the lamplighter's third crash on Murph (SIGSEGV through zypak's bus call, at teardown, seen
only in coredumpctl). A 139/SIGSEGV at start is retried once like RAL-160's abort, and a second
fails. A crash as Chrome is closed, and each Chrome core coredumpctl lists since the run began, is
said on standard error and carried to the test's; observed only, the result stands.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
@Castor-o7
Castor-o7 merged commit 61d0dca into main Nov 14, 2026
5 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant