fix: preserve OpenHuman checkpoint alignment on latest main - #95
Conversation
Co-authored-by: Medulla <medulla@tinyhumans.ai>
|
Navigate logical layers of code changes, visualize relationships, and explore their blast radius. No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉 ℹ️ Recent review info⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Organization UI Review profile: CHILL Plan: Advanced Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
Included review availability: Your plan provides up to 1 included review per hour; 0 remain after this review. 📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThe SQLite schema adds ChangesSQLite checkpoint schema
Estimated code review effort: 2 (Simple) | ~8 minutes Merge Risk: ⚪ Minimal · up to Existing checkpoint databases remain usable with the current read and write paths. No actionable merge-blocking issue remains after normal checks. 🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
A rabbit reads the schema bright, Comment |
Tiny Sweeper reviewTiny Sweeper reviewed this change across 6 lane(s) and found 0 active actionable finding(s). Detailed lane evidence and any incomplete work are listed below. State: Ready for maintainer review Review snapshot
Completeness: Complete What changedThe review could not produce a supported behavioral summary; inspect the cited changed surface and lane details below. FeaturesNone identified with supported citations. TestsNo supported feature-to-test mapping was produced. Test execution is not inferred. FindingsNo active actionable findings. Before mergeNone. How this fits togetherflowchart LR
n0["sqlite_err"]:::impacted
n1["State"]:::impacted
n2["lock_conn"]:::impacted
n3["Checkpointer"]:::impacted
n4["Checkpoint"]:::impacted
n5["Send"]:::impacted
n0 -->|calls| n4
n2 -->|calls| n4
n3 -->|uses| n1
n3 -->|uses| n4
n3 -->|uses| n5
n3 -->|implements| n5
n4 -->|uses| n1
classDef changed fill:#0d4429,stroke:#238636,color:#e6edf3
classDef impacted fill:#161b22,stroke:#6e7681,color:#c9d1d9
classDef flagged fill:#5a1e02,stroke:#d93f0b,color:#ffffff
classDef blocking fill:#67060c,stroke:#f85149,color:#ffffff
Agent review detailscritique
security
tests
commits
description
e2e
Evidence and run details
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
tinysweeper found nothing blocking. Approving.
$0.0022 · 80,973 in / 11,789 out · 6,892 cached (9%) · flash, ladder/vectors, gpt-5.6-luna, deepseek-v4-flash · 136 embedded
critique: $0.0007 · 24,700 in / 859 out · 2,032 cached (8%) · gpt-5.6-luna
security: $0.0006 · 24,162 in / 459 out · 1,788 cached (7%) · gpt-5.6-luna
tests: $0.0002 · 11,006 in / 1,140 out · 1,024 cached (9%) · deepseek-v4-flash
description: $0.0001 · 3,409 in / 1,288 out · 1,024 cached (30%) · deepseek-v4-flash
e2e: $0.0003 · 11,866 in / 3,052 out · 1,024 cached (9%) · deepseek-v4-flash
Summary
Merge upstream main into the TinyFlows revision currently pinned by OpenHuman, preserving its checkpoint schema alignment with TinyAgents. This lets OpenHuman advance this submodule without dropping the existing fix.
Related issue
None.
API or behavior changes
The checkpoint alignment on the pinned branch is preserved.
Validation
cargo check --locked --quietTests
No test code changed in the merge.
Documentation
No documentation change needed for the merge.
Checklist
#[allow(...)],#[ignore], or relaxed lints.envcontents in the diff or the descriptionSummary by CodeRabbit