#3058 Update linkcheck parameters

[sergisiso]

No description provided.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 99.90%. Comparing base (6697b23) to head (73653a1).
⚠️ Report is 15 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #3059   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   99.90%   99.90%           
=======================================
  Files         368      368           
  Lines       51992    51992           
=======================================
  Hits        51942    51942           
  Misses         50       50           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

[sergisiso]

The problem was that the default behaviour of the action is to filter unmodified lines of code. However this is not what we want as we link against generated pages, we could change what gets generated but keep the broken older link unchanged. We want to always check everything.

The action is now working properly, and example of a failed action can be seen here: https://github.com/stfc/PSyclone/actions/runs/16321579276/job/46100483733
(it will also produce inline annotations in the PR Files tab, but hopefully this are all gone when I put the PR for review)

[sergisiso]

I put this Ready for Review from @hiker even though the action still fails due to the broken links in lib/ READMEs, but I think @hiker may have been updating some of those, or at least changing the folder structure, so I need his advice to see if I should continue updating or wait for his changes to avoid conflicts.

[sergisiso]

@arporter @hiker @LonelyCat124 This is ready for review. It enables proper CI linkchecking in files outside the docs: examples, tutorials, READMEs, ... and fixes many currently broken links.

[arporter]

Thanks for fixing this Sergi and saving our blushes. Just a couple of minor things to fix and then this can go on.

Since it's all docstrings/documentation, I won't bother with the integration tests.

[sergisiso]

This is ready for another review @arporter

[arporter]

Thanks very much Sergi, all good now.
Will proceed to merge.