Skip to content

Rename CAP-0083 + add meta example#1940

Merged
anupsdf merged 1 commit into
stellar:masterfrom
bboston7:83-edits
May 30, 2026
Merged

Rename CAP-0083 + add meta example#1940
anupsdf merged 1 commit into
stellar:masterfrom
bboston7:83-edits

Conversation

@bboston7

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This change renames STELLAR_VALUE_SKIP to STELLAR_VALUE_EMPTY_TX_SET based on feedback on the name "skip" being misleading. It also adds example LedgerCloseData meta.

Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings May 29, 2026 18:17

Copilot AI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

This PR updates CAP-0083 terminology from “skip ledger” to “empty transaction set” and adds a concrete ledger-close metadata example to clarify the proposed protocol behavior.

Changes:

  • Renames CAP-0083 title and references from STELLAR_VALUE_SKIP to STELLAR_VALUE_EMPTY_TX_SET.
  • Adds a JSON-formatted LedgerCloseData example for an empty transaction set ledger.
  • Updates downstream impact, security, test case, and implementation wording.

Reviewed changes

Copilot reviewed 2 out of 2 changed files in this pull request and generated 2 comments.

File Description
core/README.md Updates the CAP-0083 title in the Core proposals index.
core/cap-0083.md Renames the proposed value type, revises semantics wording, and adds example metadata plus test/implementation references.

Comment thread core/cap-0083.md Outdated
Comment thread core/cap-0083.md Outdated
Comment thread core/cap-0083.md Outdated
anupsdf
anupsdf previously approved these changes May 29, 2026
@anupsdf anupsdf enabled auto-merge (squash) May 29, 2026 19:17
This change renames `STELLAR_VALUE_SKIP` to `STELLAR_VALUE_EMPTY_TX_SET`
based on feedback on the name "skip" being misleading. It also adds
example `LedgerCloseData` meta.
@anupsdf anupsdf merged commit e164f9f into stellar:master May 30, 2026
4 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants