Add contract build info SEP proposal.#1711
Conversation
31192b8 to
102d41f
Compare
|
@orbitlens could you please review this as well? thank you! |
f9be3a6 to
fcac47a
Compare
|
This text has nothing to do with my original SEP proposal since you removed a key part of it (the predefined workflow). Despite our multiple lengthy discussions on this particular topic. I don't think that source code authenticity guarantees laid out in the revised version of this SEP are sufficient for us. We cannot risk displaying contract source code links verified using this method on StellarExpert. Our team spent 2 years trying to make this verification routine work but since SDF is against our approach, I'm retracting my proposal. Please remove my name from the "Authors" section of this draft and feel free to merge it. |
|
This pull request is stale because it has been open for 30 days with no activity. It will be closed in 30 days unless the stale label is removed. |
6c769f8 to
04849ab
Compare
ebe141d to
45dd4ea
Compare
|
@leighmcculloch @sagpatil Can this PR be merged? Is anything blocking it? |
No description provided.