test(component-library): cover price field stepping#1271
Closed
Jonas Elfering (keulinho) wants to merge 2 commits into
Closed
test(component-library): cover price field stepping#1271Jonas Elfering (keulinho) wants to merge 2 commits into
Jonas Elfering (keulinho) wants to merge 2 commits into
Conversation
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.
|
Jonas Elfering (keulinho)
deleted the
codex/fix-number-field-step-rounding
branch
July 17, 2026 09:16
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What?
Add regression coverage for stepping a number field using the price field configuration.
Why?
Price fields use the default
0.01step withdigits=20, so the number field fix needs coverage for that consumer configuration.How?
Exercise an increment from
1.62to1.63with the price field settings.Testing?
The equivalent
sw-price-fieldcomposition test passes in Platform.Screenshots (optional)
Anything Else?