Add alias for old topic_based_ros2_control#87
Conversation
Codecov Report❌ Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #87 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 78.02% 77.89% -0.13%
==========================================
Files 6 6
Lines 455 457 +2
Branches 45 46 +1
==========================================
+ Hits 355 356 +1
- Misses 69 70 +1
Partials 31 31
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.
🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
…e_interface_plugin_description.xml Co-authored-by: Marq Rasmussen <marq.razz@gmail.com>
|
But this is only the alias/magic name for the same plugin. It has a different prefix |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I'm fine with the alias but like I said it seems limiting. Once we have GpioTopicSystem it could also be/is a TopicBasedSystem as far as the name goes. So I personally wouldn't suggest using the alias, but understand it is helpful for users migrating.
When we moved this library over to ros2_control we decided to be specific and name each one after the type the topic based system it based on but a simple alias is fine with me.
saikishor
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
As it is done for backward compatibility reasons, it looks good to me.
|
I added a runtime deprecation warning, manually tested with the rrbot of the test folder |
|
I like it. Thank you 👌🏽👌🏽 |
Not sure if this is helpful for migration like reported here