Add the new fastLZWithUpperBoundEstimator#2
Open
xiaoxiaff wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
Conversation
roberto-bayardo
approved these changes
Mar 20, 2024
Contributor
Author
|
@roberto-bayardo I am not able to merge. Feel free to merge the code if it looks good :) |
516f45f to
bbe2a5b
Compare
f7e4248 to
717b0f1
Compare
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Add a new fastLZWithUpperBoundEstimator. The 1m dataset running result (below) shows that there is no clear improvement for fastLZ with upper-bound.