Repository navigation
CLAUDE.md: drop a split campaign reference from the merge-row note - #40
Merged
Merged
Conversation
The provenance parenthesis after the merge-authority paragraph named the session it came from, split across a line break. It now keeps only the date, the operator and the bootstrap adoption. Wording only; no authority row changes meaning and no behaviour changes.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The provenance parenthesis that follows the merge-authority paragraph in
CLAUDE.mdnamed the session it was recorded in, split across a line break. It now reads "(Recorded 2026-09-01 by the operator; adopted here at bootstrap with the rest of the satellite authority table.)": the date, the operator and the bootstrap adoption stay, only the session reference goes. This is wording only: no row of the authority table changes, the paragraph it annotates is untouched, and there is no behaviour change.CLAUDE.mdis not a gated path (gate.also_gated_pathsnames onlyREADME.md), so the repo's docs-only rule applies and no gate ran; no changelog fragment, perchangelog.d/README.md.Review (my own, before opening): I re-read the diff against the acceptance (the id scan's joined pass reads zero hit lines in this repo; no behaviour change). The diff is one paragraph in
CLAUDE.md, two lines added for three removed; the new sentence restates the old one minus the session clause, in the file's own voice, and grants nothing. Id scan ofCLAUDE.md: before, one hit line (the split reference); after, zero hit lines, clean. The id scan over the branch diff againstorigin/mainis clean, and the terminology scan over the diff, the commit message, this title and this body is clean with a positive control that fired.