Fix fn strict mode#640
Merged
Merged
Conversation
Deraen
force-pushed
the
fix-fn-strict-mode
branch
from
September 29, 2025 12:58
6bbe3be to
9be6899
Compare
Deraen
marked this pull request as ready for review
September 29, 2025 12:59
green-coder
reviewed
Sep 29, 2025
Deraen
force-pushed
the
fix-fn-strict-mode
branch
2 times, most recently
from
September 29, 2025 13:06
12fab15 to
ea07fb5
Compare
Extra cleanup from StrictMode would break Ratom watches if ratom/dispose! is called before the real unmount, as we can't easily restore the watches on the second setup call.
Deraen
force-pushed
the
fix-fn-strict-mode
branch
from
September 29, 2025 13:07
ea07fb5 to
35a1347
Compare
This was referenced Sep 29, 2025
Deraen
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 4, 2025
Deraen
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 4, 2025
Deraen
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 4, 2025
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Will likely replace #636