Skip to content

E2E Test: Complex PR for Line Mapping Debug #58

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
hrishikeshio wants to merge 4 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

E2E Test: Complex PR for Line Mapping Debug #58

Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
4 commits
Select commit Hold shift + click to select a range
cf2e55e
E2E test: Add initial complex files
hrishikeshio Apr 10, 2025
16cde05
E2E test: Add initial complex files
hrishikeshio Apr 10, 2025
b19e28b
E2E test: Update complex files
hrishikeshio Apr 10, 2025
c65647e
E2E test: Update complex files
hrishikeshio Apr 10, 2025
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
8 changes: 8 additions & 0 deletions e2e_complex_file_1.txt
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
Line 1: Initial content.
Line 2: This line has been modified significantly.

@astronaut-aldrin astronaut-aldrin Bot Apr 10, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Consider adding more detail about what was modified and why. Documentation in text files helps future astronauts understand the mission history. 🚀

Line 3: Some context here.
# Line 4 deleted

@astronaut-aldrin astronaut-aldrin Bot Apr 10, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Instead of commenting that a line was deleted, consider removing this comment entirely. This creates cleaner file history. If the deletion is significant, document the reason in a README or commit message. 🛸

Line 5: More context.
Line 6: Even more context - adding modification here too.
Line 7: Final initial line.
Line 8: Added a new line near the end.

@astronaut-aldrin astronaut-aldrin Bot Apr 10, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 This looks like a self-documenting comment that might not be necessary in the actual file content. Consider whether this is meant to be actual content or just a note about the change. 🌌

10 changes: 10 additions & 0 deletions e2e_complex_file_2.py
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,10 @@
def complex_function(param_a, param_b): # Renamed function and params

@astronaut-aldrin astronaut-aldrin Bot Apr 10, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Inline comments about code changes should be in commit messages or PR descriptions, not in the code itself. Keep the code clean by removing meta-comments like "Renamed function". Instead, make sure your function name is descriptive enough. 🪐

# Initial comment remains
# Added another comment
intermediate = param_a * 2 # Changed logic slightly

@astronaut-aldrin astronaut-aldrin Bot Apr 10, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Again, comments about changes ("Changed logic slightly") should be in version control metadata, not code. Instead, explain why we're multiplying by 2 if it needs explanation. Good variable naming with intermediate though! 👨‍🚀

result = intermediate + param_b # Use new variable

@astronaut-aldrin astronaut-aldrin Bot Apr 10, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Same feedback as above regarding change-tracking comments. For actual code improvements: consider adding type hints to make the function signature more robust. For example: def complex_function(param_a: int, param_b: int) -> int: 🔭

print(f"The complex result is: {result}") # Modified print

@astronaut-aldrin astronaut-aldrin Bot Apr 10, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ For production code, consider using logging instead of print statements. This allows for better control over output verbosity. Also, the "Modified print" comment should be removed as it's a change-tracking comment. 🛸

return result

# Line after function
# Added another line unrelated