Repository navigation
Unchanged coverage treated as a Coverage evolution decrease聽#756
Description
greetings and thank you for maintaining this awesome github action! 馃憢
i've noticed some counter-intuitive behavior in my own project. is it by design that only an increase in coverage results in a green 'Coverage evolution' badge?
live example: cal-itp/benefits#4103 (comment)
perhaps its just a quirk/misconfiguration on my end? I would expect to see: 馃煝 Coverage evolution: 94% = 94% 馃煝
Activity
ewjoachim commentedon Sep 24, 2026
https://github.com/py-cov-action/python-coverage-comment-action/releases/tag/v4.4
ewjoachim commentedon Sep 24, 2026
the
>doesn't stand forgreaterbut forwent from x to y. I've replaced it with an arrow (in addition to solving the floating point bug)(... I think :D)jgravois commentedon Sep 24, 2026
ah. in this case i agree that an arrow is an improvement!
rock n roll! 馃幐 i'll update and let you know if i see anything unexpected.
thanks for engaging!
edit: looks great to me! cal-itp/benefits#4113
thekaveman commentedon Sep 24, 2026
@ewjoachim thank you so much for the quick fix here!
ewjoachim commentedon Sep 25, 2026
You're welcome. Thanks for raising this.