Skip to content

Update files for lm-eva 0.4.11#47

Closed
dhuangnm wants to merge 2 commits into
openshift-psap:mainfrom
dhuangnm:updatever
Closed

Update files for lm-eva 0.4.11#47
dhuangnm wants to merge 2 commits into
openshift-psap:mainfrom
dhuangnm:updatever

Conversation

@dhuangnm

@dhuangnm dhuangnm commented Jun 16, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Update all files for lm-eval 0.4.11 related that are needed for llm-eval-test release 0.4.3.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Version bumped to 0.4.3
    • Dependencies updated to latest compatible versions

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Jun 16, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Review Change Stack

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: b8b8237d-d936-4ba8-a9f9-97caf706672d

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between b227674 and 7837b40.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • pdm.lock is excluded by !**/*.lock
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • pylock.toml
  • pyproject.toml

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

pyproject.toml increments the package version from 0.4.2 to 0.4.3, bumps the pinned lm-eval[api] core dependency from 0.4.9.2 to 0.4.11, and raises the optional leaderboard extra lm-eval[ifeval,math,sentencepiece] minimum constraint from >=0.4.8 to >=0.4.11.

Changes

Version and Dependency Bump

Layer / File(s) Summary
Package version and lm-eval dependency updates
pyproject.toml
Version bumped from 0.4.2 to 0.4.3; lm-eval[api] pinned to 0.4.11; optional leaderboard extra lm-eval[ifeval,math,sentencepiece] minimum raised to >=0.4.11.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

Possibly related PRs

Suggested reviewers

  • dtrifiro

Poem

🐇 Hop, hop, hooray, a version anew,
From 0.4.2 to shiny .3 we flew!
The lm-eval bumped up to .11 with glee,
Constraints aligned so everything's free.
A small but tidy leap — just right for me! 🌟

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5
✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check ✅ Passed The title refers to updating files for lm-eval 0.4.11, which matches the main objective of the PR, but contains a typo ('lm-eva' instead of 'lm-eval') and is somewhat vague about what specific updates were made.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
Linked Issues check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.

✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.

✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@dtrifiro

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Thanks, moved over to #48

@dtrifiro dtrifiro closed this Jun 16, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants