Skip to content

Add an immutable reusable repository baseline - #24

Merged
openboa merged 6 commits into
mainfrom
codex/sdlc-baseline
Oct 9, 2026
Merged

openboa merged 6 commits into
mainfrom
codex/sdlc-baseline

Conversation

@openboa

@openboa openboa commented Oct 9, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Add a reusable hygiene baseline for newly initialized repositories. The base-owned caller admits same-repository pull_request_target and main pushes, verifies the exact candidate head, and checks workflows, whitespace and secrets with immutable tools. Candidate programs are never executed; workflow lint does not load local action metadata.

Review corrections reject redirected/nonregular workflow paths before stdin linting and retrieve the candidate through the base repository's PR ref. Fork PRs are explicitly unsupported in v1; checkout's default fork protection remains enabled. Existing required workflows and permissions remain intact.

Validation on 83967987ca23cc8b8eda60975eda320e434fb7bd: 40 unit tests passed, with one existing Linux-only test skipped on macOS; nine real-actionlint regression cases, actual Gitleaks historical-secret regressions, workflow/shell/JavaScript syntax and whitespace checks passed. Independent patch review found no additional issues. Current-head GitHub CI passed. Code Review and Security Review both completed on this head with no new findings; the bot recorded a positive result. The three original review threads were addressed and resolved.

Delivery requires current-head native code-owner approval. Product callers preserve their existing required baseline, bootstrap the inert wrapper through normal protected delivery, then verify main-push and subsequent target-PR provenance before registering the additional required check. No deployment, model execution or automatic merge activation is added.

@openboa
openboa requested a review from SonSangjoon as a code owner October 9, 2026 01:59
@chatgpt-codex-connector

Copy link
Copy Markdown

You have reached your Codex usage limits for code reviews. You can see your limits in the Codex usage dashboard.
To continue using code reviews, add credits to your account and enable them for code reviews in your settings.

openboa commented Oct 9, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

@codex review

Please review this complete PR at head 04b282e50ed07ebf4ddb467dac95c2f7222f199e for correctness, regressions, and security. Check the workflow trust boundaries, untrusted inputs, permission scope, and preservation of the existing checks. Treat the consolidated PR as one review unit.

@chatgpt-codex-connector

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot commented Oct 9, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review Status Commit Review trigger
📝 Code Review ✅ Completed 2026-10-09T03:32:10.551343Z 8396798 New commits
🔒 Security Review ✅ Completed 2026-10-09T03:34:28.508830Z 8396798 New commits
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 04b282e50e

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

@chatgpt-codex-connector

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🛡️ Codex Security Review · Automatically triggered

Security review completed. No security issues were found in this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 04b282e50e

View security finding report

Only the user who started this review can view the report in Codex.

ℹ️ About Codex security reviews in GitHub

This is an experimental Codex feature. Security reviews are triggered when:

  • You comment "@codex security review"
  • A regular code review gets triggered (for example, "@codex review" or when a PR is opened), and you’re opted in so security review runs alongside code review

Once complete, Codex will leave suggestions, or a comment if no findings are found.

@openboa
openboa merged commit 0d6bb15 into main Oct 9, 2026
5 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants