Skip to content

docs: propose a solo-agent SDLC successor - #22

Draft
openboa wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
codex/solo-agent-sdlc-docs
Draft

openboa wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
codex/solo-agent-sdlc-docs

Conversation

@openboa

@openboa openboa commented Sep 30, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Existing ownership prose incorrectly treated multiple account handles as independent review. Correct only that wording, preserve every CODEOWNERS route, and add a proposed solo-agent successor document linked from README. The draft separates fresh-context review evidence from merge authority, requires exact-base/head evidence, keeps candidate configuration/hooks out of a credential-bearing reviewer, prohibits moving subscription authentication into public Actions, and identifies the authoritative-producer and GitHub Free enforcement decisions still pending.

The document cites official OpenAI, Anthropic, and GitHub guidance, including the scoped November 2, 2026 pull_request_target default-policy deadline and migration intent without a broad opt-out or unsafe checkout. Zero ordinary human approvals is a proposed outcome only after authoritative gating exists; protected high-impact changes still need one explicit owner confirmation for the concrete proposal. This PR changes no live policy, workflow/code, settings, permissions, ownership route, AGENTS.md, or SECURITY.md.

Base: 700dacb. Head: 5041cdd. Local validation: npm test 31 passed, 1 existing platform skip (non-UTF8 path fixture); all workflow Actionlint, shell/Node syntax, unchanged-route/instruction assertions, new-document Markdown lint, and git diff checks passed. The existing README 96-character Markdown line remains unchanged. The added deadline paragraph received focused Markdown/diff validation; tests were not repeated because executable code and test assertions were unchanged.

Hosted run36714662387 is terminal failure at the exact head above. Trusted policy/secret scanning/isolated verification and JavaScript/TypeScript CodeQL passed. Actions CodeQL analysis succeeded, then the unchanged raw SARIF gate failed with one finding; the required aggregate consequently failed. This preserves the existing central blocker without suppressing a result or weakening a gate. This remains a draft for review, not authorization to migrate or merge.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant