Repository navigation
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Existing ownership prose incorrectly treated multiple account handles as independent review. Correct only that wording, preserve every CODEOWNERS route, and add a proposed solo-agent successor document linked from README. The draft separates fresh-context review evidence from merge authority, requires exact-base/head evidence, keeps candidate configuration/hooks out of a credential-bearing reviewer, prohibits moving subscription authentication into public Actions, and identifies the authoritative-producer and GitHub Free enforcement decisions still pending.
The document cites official OpenAI, Anthropic, and GitHub guidance, including the scoped November 2, 2026 pull_request_target default-policy deadline and migration intent without a broad opt-out or unsafe checkout. Zero ordinary human approvals is a proposed outcome only after authoritative gating exists; protected high-impact changes still need one explicit owner confirmation for the concrete proposal. This PR changes no live policy, workflow/code, settings, permissions, ownership route, AGENTS.md, or SECURITY.md.
Base: 700dacb. Head: 5041cdd. Local validation: npm test 31 passed, 1 existing platform skip (non-UTF8 path fixture); all workflow Actionlint, shell/Node syntax, unchanged-route/instruction assertions, new-document Markdown lint, and git diff checks passed. The existing README 96-character Markdown line remains unchanged. The added deadline paragraph received focused Markdown/diff validation; tests were not repeated because executable code and test assertions were unchanged.
Hosted run36714662387 is terminal failure at the exact head above. Trusted policy/secret scanning/isolated verification and JavaScript/TypeScript CodeQL passed. Actions CodeQL analysis succeeded, then the unchanged raw SARIF gate failed with one finding; the required aggregate consequently failed. This preserves the existing central blocker without suppressing a result or weakening a gate. This remains a draft for review, not authorization to migrate or merge.