Repository navigation
fix(ci): inline the trusted CodeQL authority guard - #21
Draft
SonSangjoon wants to merge 1 commit into
Draft
SonSangjoon wants to merge 1 commit into
SonSangjoon wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The central Actions CodeQL query treats the quoted temporary authority-guard invocation as a candidate-local script, leaving the required gate failed after otherwise successful extraction. Execute that small guard directly in the approved base workflow instead, retaining its full checks and preserving the external base-owned SARIF validator.
This changes only the workflow and boundary tests. A parity assertion prevents drift from the canonical guard; negative controls cover candidate helper replacement, symlinks, gitlinks, alternate npm authority, invalid roots and an early symlink in a large index. Both CodeQL languages, exact candidate SHA attribution, credential handling, isolation and fail-closed gates remain unchanged; no query suppression or alert dismissal.
Validation: local33 tests,32 passed/1 Linux-only skip on macOS; all-workflow actionlint, shell/Node syntax and diff checks passed. The existing trusted-base PR workflow will analyze this exact candidate as inert source; hosted candidate CodeQL and isolated-test outcomes will be recorded after completion. The new workflow body is not executed as privileged workflow code before merge.