pm-dispatch: drop the per-round tooling dispatch cap (≤10%); keep the pm-rule filing gate and the two round-report readings (ruling A)

Filing gate: ③ 维护者直派(改 pm 规则,维护者点名)。Maintainer Leehom, decision card in the skills seat thread, chose 「A 删上限,留读数和立卡门」 on 「"tooling 卡至多一成"这条规则保留、改还是删？」 (2026-10-26T09:22Z). Ruling record: #25768 comment 6412560587, which carries the measured basis. The card was requested by the maintainer's 「可以请skills 车道重新评估工具卡1成这个规则是否合理」.

Business reason: ③,以原话代。The cap starves lanes whose work is tooling by nature: domain:devx has 21 and domain:skills 5 of the 28 open tooling cards, and it also holds back bug fixes. Its aim, keeping attention on product, is already met (about 143 of 159 commits on main in the last 48h touch product code).
Reader who acts: the domain:skills seat (next shift).
Dedupe: domain:skills titles, open + closed, grep "10%|cap|一成" → only #25768 (closed, it landed the cap). No card asks for its removal.

What changes

references/execution-duties.md 候选与批次: delete the line 「tooling 卡至多占一轮派发的 10%,溢出留积压、⛔ 不入 pm:queue;⛔ 无门禁无脚本强制。」
SKILL.md tooling glossary row: drop the reader 「每轮派发 ≤10%」 (四具名读者 → 三具名读者).
Kept unchanged: filing-gate.md 「增改 pm 规则的卡只在维护者点名时立」 and the two round-report readings in seat-lifecycle.md. Per the option's consequence, when the product-commit share reads low for consecutive rounds the seat reports it to the maintainer. If that sentence is not already carried by the readings line, add it there, paid in-file.

Boundary

Line ratchet: a deletion frees lines. ⛔ Do not lower ceilings in this card unless the ratchet requires it.
Tier S (.claude/**). SKILL.md touched ⇒ CONTRACT_REVIEW_TIER review.

Session: session_014FZ3TJucS1L7BdMe5DAzXC (domain:skills#1, filing only; the lane is off shift)

Triage: first grade — `tooling` · `priority:p2` · `domain:skills` · `area:devpath` · `pm:queue` · triage seat · `session_01AavokzJ5DndAwitDXvKy4U` · 2026-10-26T13:03Z

⛔ Not a claim, ⛔ not a dispatch.

A ruled rule change (Leehom, A: 「删上限,留读数和立卡门」, record 6412560587). It is not reopened here. It is a governed PR to .claude/skills/pm-dispatch/**. Scope exactly as ruled: delete the ≤10% cap, and keep the pm-rule filing gate and the two round-report readings.

Generated by Claude Code

Claim: PM loop round 1 (fifth wave) · 2026-10-26T16:51Z
Session: session_01LqKsGyMNFwwnbF5FTAqyPn (seat; implementation by an in-session os-dev subagent)
Account: os-warren (the seat's linked user as GET /user answers it; the card's assignee)
Branch: claude/project-thread-1r3slx (the seat thread's harness push branch — the measured platform exception to claude/issue-N-slug; reset to origin/main 6862ef62 after PR #26210 merged and the remote branch was deleted)
Worktree: objectstack-issue-26122 in the seat's clone
Domain: domain:skills
Seat: domain:skills#2 (seat post #19287)
File surface: .claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/execution-duties.md (the tooling ≤10% line, deleted), .claude/skills/pm-dispatch/SKILL.md (the tooling glossary row, one reader dropped), .claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/seat-lifecycle.md only if the 「连续偏低时报维护者」 sentence is not already carried by the readings lines (paid in-file; 96 at its ceiling). ⛔ filing-gate.md untouched. (stop on breach; explain in the report)
Container & model: S, mode:subagent (in-session), model: CONTRACT_REVIEW_TIER (dispatch-gates --tier: MANDATORY — the pm-dispatch main file is in the surface), effort: xhigh. In-session rather than a card thread because the thread form sets the model only on the maintainer's words and this surface mandates the ceiling tier; the seat branch is free after PR #26210 merged. Governed .claude/**, Tier S: one independent CONTRACT_REVIEW_TIER review of record by an agent other than the drafter, then the seat lands through the queue (AGENTS.md Prime Directive 14; the maintainer's standing word in the seat thread 2026-10-26 13:04Z: 「你按照 pm-dispatch 技能审核的pr都可以落地」).
Clause-②: no
Metadata-protocol: none
Responsibility: n/a — not a defect card (filing gate ③; the ruling record 6412560587 on #25768 carries the maintainer's option 「A 删上限,留读数和立卡门」)
Thread-read: 6416685670
Premise: holds — on origin/main 6862ef62: execution-duties.md:9 reads 「tooling 卡至多占一轮派发的 10%,溢出留积压、⛔ 不入 pm:queue;⛔ 无门禁无脚本强制。」; SKILL.md:114 (the tooling glossary row) lists 「每轮派发 ≤10%」 among four named readers; filing-gate.md:17 and seat-lifecycle.md:72 (the product-commit share reading) are present and stay.
Serial constraints cleared: none — none of the open PRs touches .claude/skills/pm-dispatch/** (PR #26210 merged at 16:46Z); the lane's other in-flight PR #26230 touches scripts/pm/** and AGENTS.md only. #26121 and #25765 (same files, both at their ceilings) wait for this PR to land; this card goes first because its deletion frees the lines they need.

Generated by Claude Code

os-dev-report

{
  "issue": 26122,
  "status": "done",
  "branch": "claude/project-thread-1r3slx",
  "pr": "https://github.com/objectstack-ai/objectstack/pull/26254",
  "session": "session_01LqKsGyMNFwwnbF5FTAqyPn — the seat's harness-stamped id; in-session os-dev subagent, so the parent's",
  "premise_still_valid": true,
  "summary": "Deleted the per-round tooling dispatch cap in the two places it lived: the 候选与批次 line in references/execution-duties.md and the 「每轮派发 ≤10%」 reader in SKILL.md's tooling glossary row (the row now names 三具名读者 again, the exact pre-cap text). references/filing-gate.md and both round-report readings are untouched; the ruled consequence 「产品提交占比连续多轮偏低 ⇒ 席位报维护者。」 was not carried, so it was added under the product-commit-share reading in references/seat-lifecycle.md, paid in-file by deleting the line that described what the session-start-fleet.sh hook prints (its header is the authority; the 开轮互斥 rule stays). Draft PR #26254 opened through the fleet-write relay with assignee os-warren and label skip-changeset; Tier S, so the seat runs the CONTRACT_REVIEW_TIER review and lands it. Hypothesis 2 measured: the two readings landed by the cap PR (commit 5f5f0b42) are the 48h follow-up-PR count (seat-lifecycle.md line 71) and the product-commit share (line 72); there was never an in-flight tooling-share reading, so the dispatch's naming of the first reading was off while the location was right.",
  "files_changed": [
    ".claude/skills/pm-dispatch/SKILL.md",
    ".claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/execution-duties.md",
    ".claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/seat-lifecycle.md"
  ],
  "line_budget": {
    ".claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/execution-duties.md": "188 → 187 (ceiling 188 unchanged; headroom 1 — check-skill-line-ratchet.mjs only prints a lowering nudge at headroom over 120 lines and never requires lowering)",
    ".claude/skills/pm-dispatch/SKILL.md": "319 → 319 (ceiling 319; row 114 rewritten in place 228 → 207 bytes; widest table row 341 against pin 341, unchanged)",
    ".claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/seat-lifecycle.md": "96 → 96 (ceiling 96; −1 hook-output line at 115 B, +1 ruled sentence at 64 B; no re-wrap)"
  },
  "rules_retired": [
    "references/execution-duties.md line 9 「`tooling` 卡至多占一轮派发的 10%,溢出留积压、⛔ 不入 `pm:queue`;⛔ 无门禁无脚本强制。」 — true retirement by ruling (record 6412560587, option A)",
    "SKILL.md line 114, the reader 「每轮派发 ≤10%」 in the `tooling` glossary row — true retirement by ruling (same record); 候选查询排除、首触即关、普查半态行 stay",
    "references/seat-lifecycle.md line 21 「`session-start-fleet.sh` 钩子开会话即印 SKILL.md 触碰 sha 与车道席位贴行,供比对开轮标记。」 — not a rule: a description of a hook's output, which now lives only where it always was authoritative, the hook's own header (.claude/hooks/session-start-fleet.sh, 'What it prints' items 2–3); the operative 开轮互斥 rule at lines 17–18 (fetch, compute the SKILL.md touch sha with git-history.mjs touch, compare with the opening mark) is untouched; deleted to pay the ruled sentence in-file at ceiling 96"
  ],
  "tests": "No package is touched, so no ① build closure and no ② pnpm test / typecheck are owed; test:repo declared to CI. Verification = the gate set below plus byte measurements on the final tree: every edited line under 120 bytes (new seat-lifecycle line 64 B; SKILL.md row 207 B, a table row); no non-table line over 120 B in the three files; grep -rn -E '10%|一成|≤10' .claude/skills before = the two cap lines plus one non-cap hit (platform-readings.md:102 「并发 ≤100」), after = zero cap lines, the non-cap hit left; issue-number pattern #[0-9]{3,} in the diff additions = none. Ablation: n/a — docs/protocol text, no tested behaviour changed. Commit 94fbb742, 3 files, +2/−3.",
  "gates": "Local subset on head 94fbb742 (worktree /home/claude/objectstack-issue-26122, base fast-forwarded to origin/main f2e70836 before the run). node scripts/pm/dispatch-gates.mjs --commands --repo objectstack-ai/objectstack derived 20 commands; a runner executed each with the exit code captured before any pipe (scratch issue-26122/gates/summary.txt). First pass: 19 × exit 0; `pnpm --filter @objectstack/lint run check:doc-formula-expressions` exit 3 = PREREQUISITE NOT MET (@objectstack/formula and @objectstack/lint unbuilt) — its prescribed build ran under the verify lock (OS_VERIFY_LOCK_SLOT=issue-26122; VERDICT command-exit 0 · held 119s · waited 0s; 4 tasks) and the rerun exited 0 (23 record-scoped examples clean). `--ran` reconciliation: ✓ dispatch-gates --ran: 20 derived families accounted for — 20 run, 0 NOT-MEASURED, 0 UNRUN. Readings: check:pm-skill-ratchet ✓ self-test 164 cases; ✓ SKILL.md is 319 lines (ceiling 319; headroom 0), widest table row 341 bytes (pin 341); ✓ seat-lifecycle.md is 96 lines (ceiling 96); ✓ execution-duties.md is 187 lines (ceiling 188; headroom 1). check:pm-skill-id-lint ✓ 23 cases, 104 files clean. check:skill-frame-sync ✓ 14 cases; the one declared copy coherent, 4 axes. check:skill-frame-freshness (local-only, outside the derivation) ✓ 12 cases; current with origin/main (fetched). check:pm-governed-prose ✓ 31 cases, 13 surfaces. check:pm-governed-merges ✓ self-test 534 assertions. check:pm-expected-skips ✓ 173 cases. Also exit 0: check:doc-authoring, check:nul-bytes, check:agent-test-spelling, check:cross-package-test-inputs, check:driver-memory-census, check:gitlink-declared, check:refd-timer-probe, check:watch-hint-literal, check-closing-keyword-parity (and --self-test), check-comment-mask-corpus, check-governed-queue-guard --self-test, check-harness-current --self-test. Stale-tree note from --ran: 4 commits behind origin/main (81bba6c3) at reconciliation; none of them touches .claude/**, AGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md, skills/** or scripts/pm/**. CI: per the order the report is delivered at local-verification completion; the PR's check-runs were not waited for and are in_progress at report time.",
  "dogfood_battery": "n/a — no `!` in the PR title and no (narrowing) arm",
  "mcp_calls": "0 — no MCP GitHub tool was called; reads were REST GETs with the session token (issue 26122, its comments, ruling comment 6412560587, PR 26254 read-back)",
  "api_writes": "3 budgeted writes — (1) git push -u origin claude/project-thread-1r3slx (git transport, not a REST write; new remote branch, no force); (2) one fleet-write stroke POST /repos/objectstack-ai/objectstack/dispatches (HTTP 204; run 40367093725, conclusion success) executing pr_create as objectstack-fleet[bot]: POST /repos/objectstack-ai/objectstack/pulls (draft) + POST .../issues/26254/assignees (os-warren) + POST .../issues/26254/labels (skip-changeset) — read-back: 6153 bytes sent, 6153 stored, identical; labels read back on the PR: size/xs, skip-changeset; (3) POST /repos/objectstack-ai/objectstack/issues/26122/comments via scripts/pm/post-stamped.mjs --comment=26122 (this report). No PATCH, no label-write, no MCP write.",
  "deviations": [
    "Branch is claude/project-thread-1r3slx (the seat thread's harness push branch, the order's measured platform exception) instead of claude/issue-26122-slug; per os-dev.md rule 1 the empty-branch probe push is skipped for a platform-specified branch — the first push carried the commit and created the remote branch.",
    "Base moved: the worktree was created on 6862ef62 (the claim's base) and fast-forwarded to origin/main f2e70836 before the gate run because dispatch-gates flagged the tree stale; by reconciliation origin/main had advanced 4 more commits (81bba6c3) through a sibling's fetch of the shared remote-tracking ref. Not merged again: zero overlap with the surfaces the derived gates read; the PR targets main and the queue rebuilds on current main.",
    "check:doc-formula-expressions (lint package) refused on the first pass with exit 3 (unbuilt prerequisites); the build it prescribed ran under the verify lock and the gate was rerun green — recorded in the --ran file as exit 0 after the rerun.",
    "The harness attribution reminder names a model in its Co-Authored-By line; the commit carries the model-free pair spelled by os-dev.md/AGENTS.md (the reminder yields to repo instructions) and the pre-push trailer check passed.",
    "Mechanism hypothesis 2 was partly falsified by measurement: the two kept readings are the 48h follow-up-PR count and the product-commit share (commit 5f5f0b42), not an in-flight tooling share; acted per the ruling's intent — both existing readings untouched, the consequence sentence added under the product-commit share.",
    "The ruled sentence could not be folded into the product-commit-share line (118 B of 120) nor into its neighbours (119 B / 118 B), so it is a new line paid by deleting seat-lifecycle.md line 21 (see rules_retired); the ceiling 188 on execution-duties.md was left in place because the ratchet does not require lowering."
  ],
  "open_questions": [],
  "out_of_scope_findings": [
    "carrier: none · noted, not filed (protocol observation, not a card class) — the knock-then-reclaim rule is stated twice with different actors: seat-lifecycle.md 座位贴协议 names 总监席 as the releasing seat, triage-duties.md lines 72–73 carry the same rule under the triage seat's duties with the constant's value and the tool; dedupe words: RECLAIM_AFTER_HOURS, 敲门, 一笔中继释放, 总监席",
    "carrier: none · noted, not filed (protocol observation) — seat-post-protocol.md line 66 says the protocol must not copy the patrol's current cadence value, while seat-lifecycle.md line 96 carries 「默认每小时」; dedupe words: 项目席巡查, 默认每小时, 座位贴即现状",
    "grep hit outside scope, left alone — platform-readings.md line 102 「并发 ≤100」 matched the ≤10 pattern; it is a GraphQL rate-limit fact, not the cap"
  ]
}

ACCEPT → PR #26254 comment 6423045908 · domain:skills#2 · 2026-10-26T17:36Z
Contract review (CONTRACT_REVIEW_TIER, PASS on 94fbb742) → PR #26254 comment 6423017139. Tier S: the seat readies and arms the PR through the relay on this record.

Generated by Claude Code

Landed · domain:skills#2 · session_01LqKsGyMNFwwnbF5FTAqyPn · 2026-10-26T18:23Z

probe	reading
PR #26254	`merged: true` at 2026-10-26T18:21:53Z, merge commit `e05e0de8`
`origin/main`	`git log origin/main --grep=26254` answers `e05e0de8`; `execution-duties.md` is 187 lines with no `10%` line; `SKILL.md:114` names 三具名读者; `seat-lifecycle.md:72` reads 「产品提交占比连续多轮偏低 ⇒ 席位报维护者。」; `filing-gate.md` unchanged
merge queue	no `gh-readonly-queue/main/pr-26254-*` ref remains

Landing path: Tier S on the independent ## Contract review (PR comment 6423017139, CONTRACT_REVIEW_TIER, PASS on 94fbb742) and the seat's ACCEPT (6423045908); readied and armed through the relay at 2026-10-26T17:37Z on the maintainer's standing word in the seat thread.

State: the card closed as completed through Fixes #26122; pm:dispatched removed in this act (the domain, area, type and priority labels stay). The body of #26254 closes no other card. The ruling is live: no per-round tooling cap; the pm-rule filing gate and both round-report readings stand; a consecutive low product-commit share is reported to the maintainer by the seat.

Carrier, not filed: the two protocol observations from the dev report (knock-then-reclaim stated under two seats; 「默认每小时」 against the no-cadence-copy rule) go to this seat's 收班简报.

Generated by Claude Code

Navigation Menu

Repository navigation

pm-dispatch: drop the per-round tooling dispatch cap (≤10%); keep the pm-rule filing gate and the two round-report readings (ruling A) #26122

What changes

Boundary

Triage: first grade — `tooling` · `priority:p2` · `domain:skills` · `area:devpath` · `pm:queue` · triage seat · `session_01AavokzJ5DndAwitDXvKy4U` · 2026-10-26T13:03Z

Metadata

Assignees

Labels

Type

Projects

Milestone

Relationships

Development

pm-dispatch: drop the per-round tooling dispatch cap (≤10%); keep the pm-rule filing gate and the two round-report readings (ruling A) #26122

Description

What changes

Boundary

Activity

objectstack-fleet commented on Oct 26, 2026

Triage: first grade — tooling · priority:p2 · domain:skills · area:devpath · pm:queue · triage seat · session_01AavokzJ5DndAwitDXvKy4U · 2026-10-26T13:03Z

objectstack-fleet commented on Oct 26, 2026

objectstack-fleet commented on Oct 26, 2026

objectstack-fleet commented on Oct 26, 2026

objectstack-fleet commented on Oct 26, 2026

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

Labels

Type

Projects

Milestone

Relationships

Development

Issue actions

Triage: first grade — `tooling` · `priority:p2` · `domain:skills` · `area:devpath` · `pm:queue` · triage seat · `session_01AavokzJ5DndAwitDXvKy4U` · 2026-10-26T13:03Z