[PM seat] domain:ui — 🟢 os-warren · 由 os-warren 账户的项目负责 #25966

Activity

1. objectstack-fleet

   assigned

   os-steve

   on Oct 26, 2026
2. objectstack-fleet

   added

   pm:seatPM seat registry issue - single-writer body, index = this labelPM seat registry issue - single-writer body, index = this label

   on Oct 26, 2026
3. objectstack-fleet commented on Oct 26, 2026

   

   objectstack-fleetBot

   on Oct 26, 2026

   ContributorAuthor

   More actions

   Seated · domain:ui seat 1 · session_017iXjUm1rujwDk7f3KT1Pkk · account os-steve · 2026-10-26T06:25Z

   Round-open marker. Fire = the maintainer's summons in the project (「你开始负责 ui 车道，并发10」). Read in full before this round: .claude/skills/pm-dispatch/SKILL.md, every file under references/ (lanes included) and .claude/agents/os-dev.md; skill tree latest touch 744900d134 on origin/main 1d2a246ce4, harness check CURRENT.

   Mutex readings: (1)(2) no prior domain:ui post, so no sign-off and no round marker to defer to; (3) no open domain:ui card is pm:dispatched or assigned; (4) the most recently closed lane card (#25859) was closed by seat domain:spec#4, a cross-lane landing, not a domain:ui claim. Clear, so seated.
4. objectstack-fleet commented on Oct 26, 2026

   

   objectstack-fleetBot

   on Oct 26, 2026

   ContributorAuthor

   More actions

   Queue note from the devx card thread for #26074 (session_01SrpCjPfYv8N9P9EJvoDyN9, account os-elon-musk). This is a pointer, not a claim.

   Eight of this lane's PRs were removed from the merge queue by github-merge-queue[bot] between 11:16Z and 11:56Z. None of them failed CI. All eight now read mergeable_state: dirty:

   #26027, #26030, #26033, #26042, #26044, #26048, #26050, #26062

   All eight touch scripts/sdui-manifest.record.json, the single registrySourcesSha256 line. Each removal wave (11:16, 11:22, 11:32, 11:56Z) lands at the same second as another PR's merge. So every UI merge invalidates the record line in the rest, and the queue drops them.

   To get them in, each one needs a merge of main, a re-record of the manifest, and a re-queue, one at a time. Re-queue the next only after the previous one merges, or they will knock each other out again. The structural fix is #26051 (split the record per registry package), which the devx lane is being asked to dispatch now.

   Separate from this: the Test Core timeout ejections earlier today were fixed by #26077 (merged 11:58Z).

   ---

   Generated by Claude Code
5. objectstack-fleet commented on Oct 26, 2026

   

   objectstack-fleetBot

   on Oct 26, 2026

   ContributorAuthor

   More actions

   Note from devx seat 1 (#6023): #26051 landed, one re-merge per in-flight ui PR

   #26120 merged at 13:49Z as a335f1de, and #26051 is closed. scripts/sdui-manifest.record.json no longer carries the single registrySourcesSha256. Each registry package now has its own one-line record under scripts/sdui-manifest.sources/<pkg>.json.

   What each in-flight ui PR that re-records the registry does, once:

   1. git merge origin/main. On the expected conflict in scripts/sdui-manifest.record.json, take main's version: git checkout --theirs scripts/sdui-manifest.record.json.
   2. node scripts/gen-sdui-manifest-node.mjs. It rewrites only the records of the packages your PR moved (a single-package edit takes about 33 s on a warm turbo cache, 8–9 min cold).
   3. Commit and push. node scripts/check-sdui-manifest.mjs names any package still stale.

   After that, two PRs conflict only when they touch the same package. i18n is the hot one, with 6 PRs: #26123, #26055, #26048, #26045, #26044 and #26040. Round list and counts: #26074 comment 6417694823. 16 open ui PRs are affected; they land in about 6 rounds instead of 16, and the first round can take 7 together (#26123, #26062, #26060, #26042, #26030, #26027, #26011).

   Known residual (ruled acceptable by the maintainer 13:28Z): a combination of two different-package PRs that only changes the manifest together is caught at the next regeneration. The structural follow-up is #26137 (CI regenerates and compares; Tier H).

   ⛔ Pointer only. The seat touched none of this lane's PRs.

   ---

   Generated by Claude Code
6. objectstack-fleet

   changed the title [-][PM seat] domain:ui — 🟢 os-steve · 由 os-steve 账户的项目负责[/-] [+][PM seat] domain:ui — 🟢 os-warren · 由 os-warren 账户的项目负责[/+] on Oct 27, 2026
7. objectstack-fleet

   assigned

   os-warren

   and unassigned

   os-steve

   on Oct 27, 2026
8. objectstack-fleet commented on Oct 27, 2026

   

   objectstack-fleetBot

   on Oct 27, 2026

   ContributorAuthor

   More actions

   Seat taken · 2026-10-27T13:37Z · session_01JQwxbZeBv2y91towxasSUT · GitHub os-warren · 由 os-warren 账户的项目负责 · seat domain:ui#1.

   • Summons, verbatim: 「你再接管 ui seat 1」 (the maintainer, in the Claude Code project "objectstack devx", today).
   • Mutual exclusion: the newest event on this post was the previous holder's vacant body with its hand-off section (os-steve · session_017iXjUm1rujwDk7f3KT1Pkk, stood down on 「ui 车道处理完当前任务就下班」). No round-open marker followed it. check-handover --session=session_017iXjUm1rujwDk7f3KT1Pkk --account=os-steve exits 0 (two domain:skills cards it lists belong to that account's skills seat). No open domain:ui card in pm:dispatched carries a seat-1 claim; the twelve dispatched cards are seats 2 and 4. A summons on a vacant post ⇒ seated directly.
   • Harness: check-harness-current CURRENT at 4373103165. SKILL.md touch f6ffd7234, execution-duties.md touch ef48d095b, seat-lifecycle.md touch e05e0de89, lanes/ui.md touch 00a4593ad; all read in full this session.
   • Half-states fixed while seating: the title still read the previous holder, and six cards released back to pm:queue by the previous holder's own Release notes still carried assignee:os-steve ([maintainer] refactor(ui): split ObjectGrid.tsx (7641 lines) into smaller modules, one move-only slice per PR, so concurrent ui cards stop colliding in it #25994, components, app-shell: 17 EmptyState implementations, 23 Skeletons and 5 error-boundary classes; the shared DataErrorState has one importer and ViewSkeleton none — make the shared vocabulary the only one #25915, lint/types: 14,366 no-explicit-any warnings can never red CI — make it an error on packages/types/src, delete the vestigial (schema as any) reads, and type ComponentRendererProps with unknown #25918, app-shell: a published library that is 66% Console product surface — retire the 67 zero-reference exports now, decide the split, and fold the second i18n table into @object-ui/i18n #25922, retire the zero-consumer surface: nine dead modules (2,211 LOC), plugin-ai, runner's publish flag, test-only reset helpers on public barrels, the providers trio, 122 dead i18n keys, root orphans #25921, check-adr-0087-registration: PACKAGE_ROOTS omits ui/packages, ui/apps and ui/examples, so no @object-ui package can use the runtime-export-retired disposition #26220). Assignee cleared on all six, completing those releases; title and assignee of this post now match the body.
   • Ruling correction: the hand-off notes on retire the zero-consumer surface: nine dead modules (2,211 LOC), plugin-ai, runner's publish flag, test-only reset helpers on public barrels, the providers trio, 122 dead i18n keys, root orphans #25921 and check-adr-0087-registration: PACKAGE_ROOTS omits ui/packages, ui/apps and ui/examples, so no @object-ui package can use the runtime-export-retired disposition #26220 list the D9 whole-package question as waiting on the maintainer. It was ruled A before those notes were written (PR refactor(ui)!: retire @object-ui/plugin-ai and its three node types #26365 comment 6439038287; pointer on check-adr-0087-registration: PACKAGE_ROOTS omits ui/packages, ui/apps and ui/examples, so no @object-ui package can use the runtime-export-retired disposition #26220, 6439050525). The plugin-ai retirement is not in the decision box.
   • Posture: the previous term's concurrency and landing grants do not carry over. Ceiling tier out of quota for this account, so default judgment tier under the quota exemption; serial in-seat dispatch while the account's weekly usage is at its warning level. Tier H PRs ask no approver before the director contract review PASS and this seat's ACCEPT (fleet-write: relay pr_create asks the governed approvers to review a Tier H draft before any contract review exists, so an approver can approve and merge it unreviewed (#26566, #26570) #26617).

   ---

   Generated by Claude Code