Skip to content

REFER expectations#15

Open
sfgeorge wants to merge 33 commits into
mojolingo:masterfrom
sfgeorge:feature/wait_for_refer
Open

REFER expectations#15
sfgeorge wants to merge 33 commits into
mojolingo:masterfrom
sfgeorge:feature/wait_for_refer

Conversation

@sfgeorge

@sfgeorge sfgeorge commented Sep 3, 2013

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor
  • Add support for expecting and accepting a REFER message.

@sfgeorge sfgeorge mentioned this pull request Sep 3, 2013
@bklang

bklang commented Sep 3, 2013

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Ok, to answer my own question, it looks like you're using when responding with a 200 to a REFER, in which case you do not want rrs.

Also, would you mind adding some tests to cover this new functionality?

@bklang

bklang commented Sep 12, 2013

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@sfgeorge, when you get a chance: In addition to the tests, I know that @vindir identified some changes to the REFER flow that need to be made in order for it to work successfully. Would the two of you get together and update this PR to include the corrected messages?

@bklang

bklang commented Sep 17, 2013

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@sfgeorge If you would still like this merged, would you update it so it can be merged? Also, I believe @vindir had a functional change to make to the generated SIPp instructions, in light of our testing with your infrastructure.

@benlangfeld

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

This should probably wait until #34 is merged in a couple of hours.

@benlangfeld

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Ok, #34 was merged. Please ensure this PR complies with the standards of testing and documentation now in effect on Scenario.

@leifmadsen

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Pssst... just pinging the project :)

@ghost ghost assigned vindir Nov 20, 2013
@bklang

bklang commented Nov 20, 2013

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

I think there are two outstanding items on this:

  • Fix the generated XML for REFER scenarios (this one contains a bug if I recall correctly)
  • Add/update specs to handle the new methods

@sfgeorge

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Agreed! Regarding point 1, @vindir Can you share any insight you have with problems you had with the REFER dialogue I constructed?

@bklang

bklang commented Oct 7, 2014

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@sfgeorge By any chance, do you have SIPp scenarios containing a REFER that you can compare to this PR? Can you either confirm that the REFER this code generates is correct, or suggest a change?

@sfgeorge

sfgeorge commented Oct 9, 2014

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Howdy! Yes, I can sure give an example exchange from Asterisk 1.8 that matches this exchange. Would you recommend any other systems to compare against?

@bklang

bklang commented Oct 9, 2014

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

I'll take whatever examples you've got, but Asterisk 1.8 is a good start.

@benlangfeld

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@sfgeorge Do you have those examples? Might you be able to rebase this PR so we can get it in to the next version?

@sfgeorge

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Eek, sorry for the delay. Happy Holidays, Happy New Year and Happy Saint Patrick's Day! 🍀 😄

I can rebase this weekend if that works.

What's the best format for an example? I can send you pcap if that would suffice.

@benlangfeld

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

A pcap would be fine :)

@pk1057

pk1057 commented Mar 7, 2018

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Hello,
i'm interested to get this feature up and running.
Does an scripting example exist to save me some time during testing ?

@sfgeorge

sfgeorge commented Mar 7, 2018

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Hi @pk1057 my foul, I will try to update this PR and share for your and everyone's benefit. Thank you for the reminder! 🎗

@pk1057

pk1057 commented Mar 9, 2018

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Hi @sfgeorge, these are great news and i'm eagerly looking forward.
If i can help don't hesitate to contact me.

@sfgeorge sfgeorge force-pushed the feature/wait_for_refer branch from f25169c to 3dba3c7 Compare December 15, 2019 19:08
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

8 participants