You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository was archived by the owner on Sep 15, 2026. It is now read-only.
Thanks for sharing such an awesome research!
I have some questions about LayoutPrompter on the content aware layout generation task setting.
The code uses randomly selected labels (Element Type Constraint) on the test set as a query generation restriction (labels = random.choice(self.possible_labels)), but I tried it on GPT-4 API and could not achieve the results reported in the paper (That is, given different labels on the test set, the results are different.).
So I would like to know how the results reported in the paper generate the test set labels (or Element Type Constraint, like logo | text | text | text | underlay | text) that guide the LLM? Hope you response!
Thanks for sharing such an awesome research!
I have some questions about LayoutPrompter on the content aware layout generation task setting.
The code uses randomly selected labels (Element Type Constraint) on the test set as a query generation restriction (
labels = random.choice(self.possible_labels)), but I tried it onGPT-4 APIand could not achieve the results reported in the paper (That is, given different labels on the test set, the results are different.).So I would like to know how the results reported in the paper generate the test set labels (or Element Type Constraint, like
logo | text | text | text | underlay | text) that guide the LLM? Hope you response!