[draft] HEXHEX opt#682
Conversation
|
Having both for now seems like a good idea. @jmgrandy can decide if we want to merge them or not as he added the kernel and knows what it's trying to represent. |
Ok that's fine. We'll end up renaming it if we keep it separate. |
|
@stingyemperor Can you add slirp and .codex to the .gitignore? |
|
Also please remove the run outputs and build stuff. |
|
Please don't commit build directories, run output, codex files, etc. I suggest that when you execute |
| @@ -0,0 +1,5 @@ | |||
| * | |||
| !.gitignore | |||
| !INTSC_HEXHEX* | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
It's not that helpful to include these specific file names here. It's better to be sure that when you run git add you are adding what you intend to add -- avoid using wildcards
Please remove this file
| @@ -0,0 +1 @@ | |||
| /usr/WS2/gupta22/benchpark/matrix/compile_commands.json No newline at end of file | |||
| @@ -0,0 +1,80 @@ | |||
| sent tapfd=5 for tap0 | |||
| @@ -0,0 +1 @@ | |||
| [1;93m==>[0m Warning: /usr/WS2/gupta22/benchpark/repos/spack_repo/benchpark/packages/cuda/package.py:8: The `llnl` module will be removed in Spack v1.1 | |||
| @@ -0,0 +1 @@ | |||
| [1;93m==>[0m Warning: /usr/WS2/gupta22/benchpark/repos/spack_repo/benchpark/packages/cuda/package.py:8: The `llnl` module will be removed in Spack v1.1 | |||
| @@ -0,0 +1 @@ | |||
| [1;93m==>[0m Warning: /usr/WS2/gupta22/benchpark/repos/spack_repo/benchpark/packages/cuda/package.py:8: The `llnl` module will be removed in Spack v1.1 | |||
| @@ -0,0 +1 @@ | |||
| [1;93m==>[0m Warning: /usr/WS2/gupta22/benchpark/repos/spack_repo/benchpark/packages/cuda/package.py:8: The `llnl` module will be removed in Spack v1.1 | |||
| @@ -0,0 +1 @@ | |||
| /usr/WS2/gupta22/benchpark/workspace/builds/spack-stage-raja-perf-hexhex-opt-ef7ukeql5cvivsrhozb7xsll64mitykq No newline at end of file | |||
| @@ -0,0 +1 @@ | |||
| /usr/WS2/gupta22/benchpark/workspace/builds/spack-stage-raja-perf-hexhex-opt-lzhesv42i5jtd4wn6dei2x6jcpzmwdsq No newline at end of file | |||
| @@ -0,0 +1,130 @@ | |||
| #------------------------------------------------------------------------------ | |||
| @@ -0,0 +1,108 @@ | |||
| #------------------------------------------------------------------------------ | |||
|
Sorry, when I made initial commit, 610525e, I forgot that I was tracking all the changed files. I will only track changes for the kernel related files similar to 305652f . I will make a new commit to fix this.
|
stingyemperor
force-pushed
the
hexhex-opt
branch
from
c0cfabe to
853a237
Compare
4 participants
Summary
An intern (@stingyemperor) will be attempting to implement a different algorithm in
INTSC_HEXHEX-BODY. This looks like a lot of changes, but we just made a copy of the existing kernel such that we can run the two side-by-side for performance testing (I could've just built another binary aswell). The end result, if successful, should just be a modification toINTSC_HEXHEX-BODY.cpp.src/apps/INTSC_HEXHEX_NEW-BODY.cpp