Skip to content

superseded by #747: test(delta-harness): add catalog constraint scenarios - #718

Closed
mkuchenbecker wants to merge 7 commits into
linkedin:mkuchenbecker/delta-harness-docsfrom
mkuchenbecker:mkuchenbecker/delta-harness-catalog-constraints
Closed

mkuchenbecker wants to merge 7 commits into
linkedin:mkuchenbecker/delta-harness-docsfrom
mkuchenbecker:mkuchenbecker/delta-harness-catalog-constraints

Conversation

@mkuchenbecker

@mkuchenbecker mkuchenbecker commented Sep 4, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Superseded

This fork-backed PR is superseded by the same-repository PR #747. Do not reopen this PR. The replacement head and base branches both belong to linkedin/openhouse.

mkuchenbecker and others added 6 commits September 2, 2026 17:24
Add DML rejection, physical format, partition-evolution, and table
property behavior as an independent 36-case layer. Keep these catalog
constraints separate from the reusable DML and RTAS dependency path.

Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
Move DML rejection coverage into the foundation and keep file format,
partition evolution, and table properties as additive contributions.

Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
Keep layout matrices, write ordering, and property inspection with the
catalog-constraint scenarios that consume them.

Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
@mkuchenbecker mkuchenbecker reopened this Sep 17, 2026
@mkuchenbecker
mkuchenbecker changed the base branch from mkuchenbecker/delta-harness-oss to mkuchenbecker/delta-harness-docs September 17, 2026 23:41
@mkuchenbecker mkuchenbecker reopened this Sep 17, 2026
@mkuchenbecker mkuchenbecker changed the title test(delta-harness): add catalog constraint scenarios superseded by #747: test(delta-harness): add catalog constraint scenarios Sep 18, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant