Fix return policy's#262
Merged
Merged
Conversation
Member
Author
|
This depends on #739 in libsemigroups being merged first: |
Member
Author
|
@Joseph-Edwards I'm going to merge this unless you object? |
james-d-mitchell
force-pushed
the
fix-coverage
branch
from
434cf5d to
62e7f63
Compare
Joseph-Edwards
approved these changes
Jun 11, 2025
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR ensures that every function returning a
libsemigroupsobject by reference actually returns a reference in the python bindings. Unless I missed something, this should now be complete.