Skip to content

Update dependency jsonwebtoken to v9 [SECURITY]#57

Open
renovate[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
renovate/npm-jsonwebtoken-vulnerability
Open

Update dependency jsonwebtoken to v9 [SECURITY]#57
renovate[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
renovate/npm-jsonwebtoken-vulnerability

Conversation

@renovate

@renovate renovate Bot commented Mar 12, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Confidence
jsonwebtoken ^8.5.1^9.0.0 age confidence

jsonwebtoken unrestricted key type could lead to legacy keys usage

CVE-2022-23539 / GHSA-8cf7-32gw-wr33

More information

Details

Overview

Versions <=8.5.1 of jsonwebtoken library could be misconfigured so that legacy, insecure key types are used for signature verification. For example, DSA keys could be used with the RS256 algorithm.

Am I affected?

You are affected if you are using an algorithm and a key type other than the combinations mentioned below

Key type algorithm
ec ES256, ES384, ES512
rsa RS256, RS384, RS512, PS256, PS384, PS512
rsa-pss PS256, PS384, PS512

And for Elliptic Curve algorithms:

alg Curve
ES256 prime256v1
ES384 secp384r1
ES512 secp521r1
How do I fix it?

Update to version 9.0.0. This version validates for asymmetric key type and algorithm combinations. Please refer to the above mentioned algorithm / key type combinations for the valid secure configuration. After updating to version 9.0.0, If you still intend to continue with signing or verifying tokens using invalid key type/algorithm value combinations, you’ll need to set the allowInvalidAsymmetricKeyTypes option to true in the sign() and/or verify() functions.

Will the fix impact my users?

There will be no impact, if you update to version 9.0.0 and you already use a valid secure combination of key type and algorithm. Otherwise, use the allowInvalidAsymmetricKeyTypes option to true in the sign() and verify() functions to continue usage of invalid key type/algorithm combination in 9.0.0 for legacy compatibility.

Severity

  • CVSS Score: 8.1 / 10 (High)
  • Vector String: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N

References

This data is provided by the GitHub Advisory Database (CC-BY 4.0).


jsonwebtoken's insecure implementation of key retrieval function could lead to Forgeable Public/Private Tokens from RSA to HMAC

CVE-2022-23541 / GHSA-hjrf-2m68-5959

More information

Details

Overview

Versions <=8.5.1 of jsonwebtoken library can be misconfigured so that passing a poorly implemented key retrieval function (referring to the secretOrPublicKey argument from the readme link) will result in incorrect verification of tokens. There is a possibility of using a different algorithm and key combination in verification than the one that was used to sign the tokens. Specifically, tokens signed with an asymmetric public key could be verified with a symmetric HS256 algorithm. This can lead to successful validation of forged tokens.

Am I affected?

You will be affected if your application is supporting usage of both symmetric key and asymmetric key in jwt.verify() implementation with the same key retrieval function.

How do I fix it?

Update to version 9.0.0.

Will the fix impact my users?

There is no impact for end users

Severity

  • CVSS Score: 5.0 / 10 (Medium)
  • Vector String: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L

References

This data is provided by the GitHub Advisory Database (CC-BY 4.0).


jsonwebtoken vulnerable to signature validation bypass due to insecure default algorithm in jwt.verify()

CVE-2022-23540 / GHSA-qwph-4952-7xr6

More information

Details

Overview

In versions <=8.5.1 of jsonwebtoken library, lack of algorithm definition and a falsy secret or key in the jwt.verify() function can lead to signature validation bypass due to defaulting to the none algorithm for signature verification.

Am I affected?

You will be affected if all the following are true in the jwt.verify() function:

  • a token with no signature is received
  • no algorithms are specified
  • a falsy (e.g. null, false, undefined) secret or key is passed
How do I fix it?

Update to version 9.0.0 which removes the default support for the none algorithm in the jwt.verify() method.

Will the fix impact my users?

There will be no impact, if you update to version 9.0.0 and you don’t need to allow for the none algorithm. If you need 'none' algorithm, you have to explicitly specify that in jwt.verify() options.

Severity

  • CVSS Score: 6.4 / 10 (Medium)
  • Vector String: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:L

References

This data is provided by the GitHub Advisory Database (CC-BY 4.0).


Release Notes

auth0/node-jsonwebtoken (jsonwebtoken)

v9.0.0

Compare Source

Breaking changes: See Migration from v8 to v9

Breaking changes
  • Removed support for Node versions 11 and below.
  • The verify() function no longer accepts unsigned tokens by default. ([8345030]8345030)
  • RSA key size must be 2048 bits or greater. ([ecdf6cc]ecdf6cc)
  • Key types must be valid for the signing / verification algorithm
Security fixes
  • security: fixes Arbitrary File Write via verify function - CVE-2022-23529
  • security: fixes Insecure default algorithm in jwt.verify() could lead to signature validation bypass - CVE-2022-23540
  • security: fixes Insecure implementation of key retrieval function could lead to Forgeable Public/Private Tokens from RSA to HMAC - CVE-2022-23541
  • security: fixes Unrestricted key type could lead to legacy keys usage - CVE-2022-23539

Configuration

📅 Schedule: (UTC)

  • Branch creation
    • At any time (no schedule defined)
  • Automerge
    • At any time (no schedule defined)

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR was generated by Mend Renovate. View the repository job log.

@renovate renovate Bot changed the title Update dependency jsonwebtoken to v9 [SECURITY] Update dependency jsonwebtoken to 9.0.0 [SECURITY] Mar 18, 2023
@renovate renovate Bot force-pushed the renovate/npm-jsonwebtoken-vulnerability branch from 15155c4 to 2e9330c Compare March 18, 2023 18:06
@renovate renovate Bot changed the title Update dependency jsonwebtoken to 9.0.0 [SECURITY] Update dependency jsonwebtoken to v9 [SECURITY] Mar 20, 2023
@renovate renovate Bot force-pushed the renovate/npm-jsonwebtoken-vulnerability branch from 2e9330c to 7659a41 Compare August 11, 2025 04:00
@renovate renovate Bot force-pushed the renovate/npm-jsonwebtoken-vulnerability branch from 7659a41 to c1f6dcf Compare October 23, 2025 07:00
@renovate renovate Bot force-pushed the renovate/npm-jsonwebtoken-vulnerability branch from c1f6dcf to c0b2a31 Compare January 1, 2026 15:46
@renovate renovate Bot force-pushed the renovate/npm-jsonwebtoken-vulnerability branch from c0b2a31 to 6c3e82b Compare February 13, 2026 07:52
@renovate renovate Bot force-pushed the renovate/npm-jsonwebtoken-vulnerability branch from 6c3e82b to cdaad28 Compare May 13, 2026 20:16
@renovate renovate Bot force-pushed the renovate/npm-jsonwebtoken-vulnerability branch from cdaad28 to b605208 Compare May 24, 2026 11:01
@renovate renovate Bot force-pushed the renovate/npm-jsonwebtoken-vulnerability branch from b605208 to 2b08539 Compare June 13, 2026 04:01
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

0 participants