docs: fix typos and capitalization in Joint Inference proposal

[Raja-89]

Description

This PR fixes several documentation inconsistencies in the joint-inference.md proposal to improve readability and correctness.

Changes

• Typo Fix: Corrected JoinInferenceServiceStatus to JointInferenceServiceStatus in the struct definition (missing 't').
• Formatting: Capitalized api to API in section headers for consistency.
• Grammar: Changed "status that send to" to "status that is sent to" in code comments.

Checklist

• I have read the contribution guidelines.
• I have checked for similar issues/PRs.

[kubeedge-bot]

Welcome @Raja-89! It looks like this is your first PR to kubeedge/sedna 🎉

[gemini-code-assist]

Summary of Changes

Hello @Raja-89, I'm Gemini Code Assist¹! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request focuses on refining the joint-inference.md proposal by addressing several documentation inconsistencies. The changes aim to improve the overall readability and correctness of the document through typo corrections, capitalization standardization, and grammatical improvements, ensuring the proposal is clear and professional.

Highlights

• Typo Correction: Corrected a typo in the JointInferenceServiceStatus struct definition, adding the missing 't' for accuracy.
• Capitalization Consistency: Standardized capitalization of 'api' to 'API' in section headers for improved consistency and adherence to common technical acronym usage.
• Grammar Improvement: Enhanced grammatical correctness in a code comment, changing 'status that send to' to 'status that is sent to' for better clarity.

Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature	Command	Description
Code Review	/gemini review	Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary	/gemini summary	Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment	@gemini-code-assist	Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help	/gemini help	Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩

[kubeedge-bot]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by:
To complete the pull request process, please assign jaypume after the PR has been reviewed.
You can assign the PR to them by writing /assign @jaypume in a comment when ready.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Details

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• docs/OWNERS

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

[gemini-code-assist]

Code Review

This pull request does a good job of fixing typos and improving consistency in the joint-inference.md documentation. The changes make the proposal easier to read and understand. I've found one minor oversight where a typo fix was missed in a comment, and I've left a suggestion to correct it. Overall, these are valuable improvements to the documentation.

[Raja-89]

/assign @jaypume

Fixed the typo in the comment as pointed out by the review bot. Ready for review!