Skip to content

ci: bump pinned action versions (pass 1 of #367)#376

Open
fpelliccioni wants to merge 1 commit into
masterfrom
ci/bump-actions-v7
Open

ci: bump pinned action versions (pass 1 of #367)#376
fpelliccioni wants to merge 1 commit into
masterfrom
ci/bump-actions-v7

Conversation

@fpelliccioni

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

First of three CI maintenance passes from #367.

Bumps the four heavily-used third-party actions to current upstream majors:

Action Old New
`actions/checkout` v4.3.1 v7.0.0
`actions/upload-artifact` v4.6.2 v7.0.1
`actions/download-artifact` v4.3.0 v8.0.1
`actions/setup-python` v5.6.0 v6.2.0

SHAs and version comments updated together so the supply-chain pinning is preserved. `actions/cache` is already on its current major (v5.0.5) so it's left alone.

Pass 2 (runner images / container images) and pass 3 (compilers) are tracked separately.

actions/checkout v4.3.1 → v7.0.0
actions/upload-artifact v4.6.2 → v7.0.1
actions/download-artifact v4.3.0 → v8.0.1
actions/setup-python v5.6.0 → v6.2.0

Bumps the four heavily-used third-party actions to current upstream
majors. Each artifact action moved by 3-4 majors; the cache action
is already on its current major (v5.0.5) so it's left alone.

Pass 1 of three for #367.
@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Jun 19, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Important

Review skipped

Review was skipped due to path filters

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (17)
  • .github/workflows/build-deps-with-container.yml is excluded by !.github/** and included by none
  • .github/workflows/build-deps-without-container.yml is excluded by !.github/** and included by none
  • .github/workflows/build-wasm.yml is excluded by !.github/** and included by none
  • .github/workflows/build-with-container.yml is excluded by !.github/** and included by none
  • .github/workflows/build-without-container.yml is excluded by !.github/** and included by none
  • .github/workflows/calc-deps-with-container.yml is excluded by !.github/** and included by none
  • .github/workflows/calc-deps-without-container.yml is excluded by !.github/** and included by none
  • .github/workflows/check-conan-updates.yml is excluded by !.github/** and included by none
  • .github/workflows/cosmetic-changes.yml is excluded by !.github/** and included by none
  • .github/workflows/coverage.yml is excluded by !.github/** and included by none
  • .github/workflows/main.yml is excluded by !.github/** and included by none
  • ci_utils/.github/workflows/build-deps-with-container.yml is excluded by none and included by none
  • ci_utils/.github/workflows/build-deps-without-container.yml is excluded by none and included by none
  • ci_utils/.github/workflows/build-with-container.yml is excluded by none and included by none
  • ci_utils/.github/workflows/build-without-container.yml is excluded by none and included by none
  • ci_utils/.github/workflows/calc-deps-with-container.yml is excluded by none and included by none
  • ci_utils/.github/workflows/calc-deps-without-container.yml is excluded by none and included by none

CodeRabbit blocks several paths by default. You can override this behavior by explicitly including those paths in the path filters. For example, including **/dist/** will override the default block on the dist directory, by removing the pattern from both the lists.

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 7db0ba3d-63f4-4fc7-90e7-23e05d9717b4

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

Use the checkbox below for a quick retry:

  • 🔍 Trigger review
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Commit unit tests in branch ci/bump-actions-v7

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant