Repository navigation
version up, runs, tsp eval - #31
Merged
Merged
Conversation
Annotation coverage on pydantic 2.13.5
A check in one process takes 2.65s with this PR and 2.62s with Each side fixes with its own constricter; this PR counts both, with |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What's new
What changed and why
____________ used to [be/do/say] ____________ but now it [is/does/says] ____________ because of
____________.
Release note
none
Issue and discussion links
Link any relevant issues or discussions here.
Checklist
If one of these cannot be completed, give a justification.
tests/ci_local.py, see docs/CONTRIBUTING.md)AI disclosure
AI usage is allowed on this project, but "[agent] said _______" is not a valid excuse for problems
with the final product.
entirely hand written.