Skip to content

version up, runs, tsp eval - #31

Merged
ivylikethevine merged 8 commits into
mainfrom
dev
Oct 10, 2026
Merged

ivylikethevine merged 8 commits into
mainfrom
dev

Conversation

@ivylikethevine

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

What's new

What changed and why

____________ used to [be/do/say] ____________ but now it [is/does/says] ____________ because of
____________.

Release note

none

Issue and discussion links

Link any relevant issues or discussions here.

Checklist

If one of these cannot be completed, give a justification.

  • CI's checks pass locally (tests/ci_local.py, see docs/CONTRIBUTING.md)
  • New behaviour has tests; coverage stays at 100%
  • Affected docs are updated (README, and docs/CHANGELOG.md for user-facing changes)

AI disclosure

AI usage is allowed on this project, but "[agent] said _______" is not a valid excuse for problems
with the final product.

  • (If applicable) This code was written with generative AI.
  • (If yes to above) I have reviewed, understood, and stand behind this code as if it were
    entirely hand written.

@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Oct 9, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Annotation coverage on pydantic 2.13.5

Typed as released After --fix After --fix --unsafe-fixes Bindings
main 21.8% 50.5% 60.3% 3956
This PR 21.8% 50.4% 60.2% 3956
Change +0.0 pts -0.1 pts -0.1 pts +0

A check in one process takes 2.65s with this PR and 2.62s with main (+0.9%), each the median of 5 runs on this runner.

Each side fixes with its own constricter; this PR counts both, with --coverage and all-scopes. Measured at 00c83ea by this run.

@ivylikethevine ivylikethevine changed the title Dev version up, runs, tsp eval Oct 9, 2026
@ivylikethevine
ivylikethevine merged commit 451a3c1 into main Oct 10, 2026
52 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant