Skip to content

Fix docs-as-code manuscript links#215

Merged
ootakazuhiko merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
codex/fix-docs-as-code-manuscript-links
Apr 2, 2026
Merged

Fix docs-as-code manuscript links#215
ootakazuhiko merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
codex/fix-docs-as-code-manuscript-links

Conversation

@ootakazuhiko

@ootakazuhiko ootakazuhiko commented Mar 31, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Summary

  • replace leftover /src/... links in the Docs-as-Code manuscript chapter with the published chapter paths
  • keep the manuscript navigation aligned with the already-correct docs output

Verification

  • git diff --check
  • npm ci
  • npx markdownlint-cli manuscript/chapter-docs-as-code/index.md
  • python3 scripts/check_markdown_internal_links.py manuscript/chapter-docs-as-code/index.md
  • python3 scripts/check_bidi_unicode.py

@ootakazuhiko ootakazuhiko marked this pull request as ready for review April 2, 2026 05:30
Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings April 2, 2026 05:30

Copilot AI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

This PR cleans up internal navigation links in the Docs-as-Code manuscript chapter by replacing legacy /src/... references with the published /chapters/... paths, keeping the manuscript consistent with the site’s current URL structure.

Changes:

  • Update the “Issue / Projects” reference link to point at /chapters/chapter-issue-management/.
  • Update the “GitHub Actions” reference link to point at /chapters/chapter-github-actions/.

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

@ootakazuhiko ootakazuhiko merged commit 7a62988 into main Apr 2, 2026
7 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants