Skip to content

Multi-Objective Support in InfiniteOpt#434

Open
PetiteChouette wants to merge 5 commits into
infiniteopt:masterfrom
PetiteChouette:master
Open

Multi-Objective Support in InfiniteOpt#434
PetiteChouette wants to merge 5 commits into
infiniteopt:masterfrom
PetiteChouette:master

Conversation

@PetiteChouette

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Added support for multiple objectives within InfiniteOpt by modifying the previous support for scalars to vectors of scalars. Modified the relevant doc strings and added a subsection in the objective Markdown file.

@codecov

codecov Bot commented Jun 18, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 33.33333% with 2 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 99.75%. Comparing base (40c897d) to head (c1c70a0).

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
src/TranscriptionOpt/transcribe.jl 0.00% 2 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #434      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   99.77%   99.75%   -0.03%     
==========================================
  Files          39       39              
  Lines        6797     6810      +13     
==========================================
+ Hits         6782     6793      +11     
- Misses         15       17       +2     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@pulsipher pulsipher left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for this. A few things:

  • The rocket example should be added/altered in a separate PR
  • The documentation on multi-objectives should mention something about what solvers support this (e.g., MultiObjectiveAlgorithms.jl) and perhaps even link to the JuMP docs on this.
  • Please also add unit tests to test this new functionality.

@pulsipher pulsipher mentioned this pull request Jun 19, 2026
6 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants