A single-operator agentic-research demonstration, packaged as a submission to The Lancet Digital Health (article type: Viewpoint, 2 500 words).
The submitted Viewpoint argues that the new minimum disclosure unit for agentic-LLM-assisted research is prompt + commit hash + tagged release, not the classical methods-section narrative. The argument is operationalised by this repository: every artefact the proposed disclosure standard would require is published here, with nothing redacted and no post-hoc curation. A reviewer who accepts the Viewpoint endorses the methodology; a reviewer who rejects it must do so on grounds the repository itself disproves.
The medium is the message.
manuscript/ The Lancet Digital Health Viewpoint (primary deliverable)
main.tex LaTeX source, Vancouver superscript-numeric style
references.bib up to 30 references
JOURNAL.md distilled author instructions for Lancet DH
cover-letter.md submission cover letter (drafted in Phase 8)
Makefile, latexmkrc build helpers
figures/ generated by case-study analysis, not by AI
case-study/ Supporting empirical artefact (Layer 1 pipeline output)
analysis/ 01..05 numbered scripts (HCC OS stratification)
data/raw/ gitignored, regenerable from documented URLs
data/processed/ gitignored, regenerable
data/results/ small analytic artefacts kept in-repo
figures/ figure PDFs
manuscript/ the Layer-1-produced case-study draft manuscript
reviewer-logs/ Verbatim transcripts of every reviewer-subagent round
round-01/.. round-NN/ one per round, four reviewers each
audit/ Layer-2 audit transcript and findings.md
prompts/ The protocol artefacts (the Viewpoint's key claim)
00-original-spec.md operator-supplied orchestration spec (verbatim)
01-layer1-pipeline.md Layer 1 autonomous pipeline kickoff prompt
02-layer2-audit.md Layer 2 audit subagent prompt
03-reviewer-*.md four reviewer persona prompts
docs/ The integrity anchors
design.md three-layer architecture, honesty contract
prereg.md Layer-3 external-validation preregistration
ai-usage-disclosure.md exhaustive AI-tool / prompt / task disclosure
ledger.md chronological artefact ledger (Figure 1 source)
.github/workflows/ CI that rebuilds the manuscript on each v* tag
.gitignore, LICENSE, pyproject.toml
manuscript/main.pdf— the Viewpoint, 2 500 words. Compile withcd manuscript && make.docs/ai-usage-disclosure.md— every AI tool and every operator intervention, itemised.prompts/00-original-spec.md— the operator-supplied orchestration prompt the Viewpoint defends.case-study/manuscript/main.pdf— Layer 1's autonomous output (the "what the pipeline actually produced" artefact).reviewer-logs/round-01..NN/— the reviewer-loop transcripts.reviewer-logs/audit/findings.md— Layer-2 audit findings.docs/ledger.md— chronological artefact ledger (Figure 1 source).
The case-study analysis is reproducible from a clean clone:
uv sync
cd case-study
uv run python analysis/01_prepare_data.py
uv run python analysis/02_layer1_risk_score.py
uv run python analysis/03_layer3_external_validation.py
uv run python analysis/04_figures.py
cd ../manuscript && make # build Viewpoint PDFLLMs are not bit-deterministic; the reproducibility claim is
distributional (substantive findings reproduce, not character-level
outputs). See prompts/README.md.
Hsieh-Ting Lin, M.D., Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Koo Foundation Sun Yat-Sen Cancer Center, Taipei, Taiwan. ORCID: 0009-0002-3974-4528.
MIT. See LICENSE.
viewpoint-v<x>.<y>.<z>— Viewpoint manuscript releases.case-study-v<x>.<y>.<z>— Case-study manuscript releases.