Update sentry-rust monorepo to 0.48.0 by hash-worker[bot] · Pull Request #8715 · hashintel/hash

hash-worker · 2026-05-13T00:01:52Z

This PR contains the following updates:

Package	Type	Update	Change	Pending
sentry (source)	workspace.dependencies	minor	`0.47.0` → `0.48.0`	`0.48.3`
sentry-core (source)	workspace.dependencies	minor	`0.47.0` → `0.48.0`	`0.48.3`
sentry-types (source)	workspace.dependencies	minor	`0.47.0` → `0.48.0`	`0.48.3`

Warning

Some dependencies could not be looked up. Check the Dependency Dashboard for more information.

Release Notes

getsentry/sentry-rust (sentry)

`v0.48.2`

Compare Source

New Features

Added rustls-no-provider feature flag in the sentry crate to allow using the rustls transport with a different crypto provider (#1103).

Fixes

Serialize attachment envelope headers as JSON to correctly encode header values (#1109).
Use checked arithmetic to handle possible overflows (#1119, #1121, #1122).

`v0.48.1`

Compare Source

Fixes

Changed ClientOptions::enable_metrics to default to true, aligning metrics behavior with other Sentry SDKs (#1106). Metric capture APIs still require the metrics feature flag at compile time.

`v0.48.0`

Compare Source

Breaking Changes

Added the following metrics-related fields to the ClientOptions struct in sentry-core. Both fields are no-ops, unless the metrics feature flag is enabled:
- enable_metrics, used to enable sending metrics to Sentry (#1073).
- before_send_metric, used to define a callback for filtering/pre-processing metrics before sending to Sentry (#1064).
There are several breakages related to the SemVer feature additivity bug fixes:
- sentry_core::ClientOptions fields before_send_log, enable_logs, auto_session_tracking, and session_mode are no longer gated behind the logs and release-health feature flags (#1091). Code that constructs ClientOptions with a full struct literal (without ..Default::default()), or which exhaustively matches against it, must now include all four fields regardless of enabled features.
- sentry_core::Scope can no longer be publicly constructed or exhaustively matched against, even when the client feature is disabled (#1094). Previously, both of these were possible when client was disabled.
- sentry_core::Scope::add_event_processor now requires passed closures to be RefUnwindSafe (#1093). Thanks to this change, sentry_core::Scope is now UnwindSafe regardless of feature flag configuration; previously, Scope was only UnwindSafe when the client feature was disabled.
- sentry_tracing::EventMapping is now #[non_exhaustive] (#1097).
- sentry_log::RecordMapping is now #[non_exhaustive] (#1098).

New Features

📊📈💯 The Sentry-Rust SDK now supports emitting Sentry Metrics (#1073)!

To get started, you will need to add the metrics feature flag when compiling the sentry crate. You will also need to enable metrics when initializing the SDK, like so:

use sentry::ClientOptions;

let _guard = sentry::init((
    "(your DSN here)",
    ClientOptions {
        enable_metrics: true,
        // ... other options ...
        ..Default::default()
    },
));

You can then capture metrics as follows:

use sentry::metrics;
use sentry::types::protocol::latest::Unit;

// We support counter, gauge, and distribution metrics.
metrics::counter("example.counter", 1).capture();
metrics::gauge("connections", 20).capture();
metrics::distribution("response.time", 123.4)
    .unit(Unit::Millisecond) // units can also be set on gauges
    .attribute("http.status", 200) // attributes can be set on all metric types
    .capture();

Fixes

Fixed several feature additivity SemVer violations, where enabling a feature flag could have introduced breaking changes. All known violations are fixed now, so simply enabling an additional feature flag in any Sentry SDK crate should no longer cause any public API breakages. Fixing these issues required us to break the public API in some places; those breakages are detailed above.

Configuration

📅 Schedule: (UTC)

Branch creation
- "before 4am every weekday,every weekend"
Automerge
- "before 4am every weekday,every weekend"

🚦 Automerge: Enabled.

♻ Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about these updates again.

If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR has been generated by Renovate Bot.

vercel · 2026-05-13T00:01:54Z

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project	Deployment	Actions	Updated (UTC)
hash	Ready	Preview, Comment	Jun 24, 2026 10:06am
hashdotdesign-tokens	Ready	Preview, Comment	Jun 24, 2026 10:06am
petrinaut	Ready	Preview, Comment	Jun 24, 2026 10:06am

cursor · 2026-05-13T00:02:00Z

PR Summary

Medium Risk
Minor-version bump on error-reporting/observability with upstream API and default-behavior changes, though this PR only updates lockfile pins and init already uses ..Default::default().

Overview
Bumps workspace sentry, sentry-core, and sentry-types from 0.47.0 to 0.48.0 in Cargo.toml, with Cargo.lock refreshed so the resolved sentry-* crates land on 0.48.2 and transitive deps shift (e.g. consolidated spin, windows-sys 0.60.2).

There are no Rust source changes—only dependency versions. Existing Sentry setup in hash-telemetry still builds ClientOptions with ..Default::default(), so new 0.48 fields (metrics, logs/session options) pick up SDK defaults without edits here. Reviewers should still be aware of upstream 0.48 behavior changes (metrics APIs behind the metrics feature, enable_metrics defaulting to true in 0.48.1, attachment header encoding fixes) even though this repo does not enable metrics on the sentry crate today.

^{Reviewed by Cursor Bugbot for commit b72596a. Bugbot is set up for automated code reviews on this repo. Configure here.}

augmentcode · 2026-05-13T00:03:03Z

🤖 Augment PR Summary

Summary: Updates the Rust Sentry SDK workspace dependencies to the 0.48.x line.

Changes:

Bumped sentry, sentry-core, and sentry-types from 0.47.0 → 0.48.0 in the workspace Cargo.toml
Regenerated Cargo.lock accordingly

Technical Notes: Sentry 0.48 introduces upstream API changes (notably around ClientOptions/Scope and new metrics-related options); this PR itself is dependency-only and relies on downstream crates compiling cleanly against the updated SDK.

_{🤖 Was this summary useful? React with 👍 or 👎}

augmentcode

Review completed. No suggestions at this time.

Comment augment review to trigger a new review at any time.

codecov · 2026-05-13T00:05:12Z

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 59.59%. Comparing base (d145e88) to head (b72596a).

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #8715      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   59.60%   59.59%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files        1348     1348              
  Lines      131904   131904              
  Branches     5944     5944              
==========================================
- Hits        78615    78614       -1     
- Misses      52384    52385       +1     
  Partials      905      905

Flag	Coverage Δ
apps.hash-ai-worker-ts	`1.39% <ø> (ø)`
apps.hash-api	`0.00% <ø> (ø)`
blockprotocol.type-system	`40.84% <ø> (ø)`
local.claude-hooks	`0.00% <ø> (ø)`
local.harpc-client	`51.49% <ø> (ø)`
local.hash-backend-utils	`2.82% <ø> (ø)`
local.hash-graph-sdk	`9.63% <ø> (ø)`
local.hash-isomorphic-utils	`0.00% <ø> (ø)`
rust.antsi	`0.00% <ø> (ø)`
rust.error-stack	`90.87% <ø> (ø)`
rust.harpc-codec	`84.70% <ø> (ø)`
rust.harpc-net	`96.19% <ø> (-0.02%)`	⬇️
rust.harpc-tower	`67.03% <ø> (ø)`
rust.harpc-types	`0.00% <ø> (ø)`
rust.harpc-wire-protocol	`92.23% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hash-codec	`72.76% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hash-graph-api	`2.52% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hash-graph-authorization	`62.34% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hash-graph-postgres-store	`28.97% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hash-graph-store	`38.04% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hash-graph-temporal-versioning	`47.95% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hash-graph-types	`0.00% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hash-graph-validation	`83.43% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hashql-ast	`87.23% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hashql-compiletest	`28.24% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hashql-core	`79.60% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hashql-diagnostics	`72.31% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hashql-eval	`75.23% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hashql-hir	`89.06% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hashql-mir	`88.45% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hashql-syntax-jexpr	`94.04% <ø> (ø)`

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

codspeed-hq · 2026-05-13T00:07:57Z

Merging this PR will degrade performance by 15.38%

❌ 2 regressed benchmarks
✅ 78 untouched benchmarks

Warning

Please fix the performance issues or acknowledge them on CodSpeed.

Performance Changes

	Benchmark	`BASE`	`HEAD`	Efficiency
❌	`bit_matrix/dense/iter_row[64]`	140.8 ns	170 ns	-17.16%
❌	`bit_matrix/dense/iter_row[200]`	185.8 ns	215 ns	-13.57%

Tip

Investigate this regression by commenting @codspeedbot fix this regression on this PR, or directly use the CodSpeed MCP with your agent.

_{Comparing deps/rs/sentry-rust-monorepo (b72596a) with main (d145e88)}

github-actions · 2026-06-24T11:10:36Z

Benchmark results

@rust/hash-graph-benches – Integrations

policy_resolution_large

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 2002	$$27.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 232 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.24 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.54 \mathrm{ms} \pm 24.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.28 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 1001	$$13.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 89.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}8.81 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 3314	$$44.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 452 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.71 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$14.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 103 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.363 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 1526	$$24.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 197 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.71 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 2078	$$29.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 330 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.92 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.96 \mathrm{ms} \pm 31.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.60 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 1033	$$14.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 112 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}12.9 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_medium

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 102	$$3.81 \mathrm{ms} \pm 29.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.061 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.03 \mathrm{ms} \pm 19.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.738 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 51	$$3.35 \mathrm{ms} \pm 22.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.031 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 269	$$5.28 \mathrm{ms} \pm 43.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.583 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.61 \mathrm{ms} \pm 21.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.24 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 107	$$4.19 \mathrm{ms} \pm 27.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.78 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 133	$$4.53 \mathrm{ms} \pm 31.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.48 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.46 \mathrm{ms} \pm 20.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.339 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 63	$$4.11 \mathrm{ms} \pm 27.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.550 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_none

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 2	$$2.75 \mathrm{ms} \pm 14.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}6.83 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.57 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.86 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 1	$$2.73 \mathrm{ms} \pm 18.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}6.69 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 8	$$3.01 \mathrm{ms} \pm 22.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}5.11 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.80 \mathrm{ms} \pm 16.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}5.94 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 3	$$3.01 \mathrm{ms} \pm 23.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}5.75 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_small

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 52	$$3.05 \mathrm{ms} \pm 22.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.175 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.79 \mathrm{ms} \pm 17.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.97 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 25	$$3.01 \mathrm{ms} \pm 16.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.378 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 94	$$3.47 \mathrm{ms} \pm 24.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.815 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.98 \mathrm{ms} \pm 23.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.28 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 26	$$3.32 \mathrm{ms} \pm 22.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.18 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 66	$$3.43 \mathrm{ms} \pm 22.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.25 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.95 \mathrm{ms} \pm 14.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.788 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 29	$$3.43 \mathrm{ms} \pm 22.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.01 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

read_scaling_complete

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id;one_depth	1 entities	$$42.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 247 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.44 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	10 entities	$$32.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 197 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.819 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	25 entities	$$36.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 189 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.42 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	5 entities	$$31.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 208 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-12.744 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	50 entities	$$43.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 257 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.04 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	1 entities	$$51.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 541 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.32 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	10 entities	$$41.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 292 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.40 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	25 entities	$$93.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 655 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}9.24 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	5 entities	$$33.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 211 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.51 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	50 entities	$$263 \mathrm{ms} \pm 1.00 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{lightgreen}-5.005 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	1 entities	$$10.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 67.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.62 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	10 entities	$$10.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 75.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.35 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	25 entities	$$10.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 65.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.91 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	5 entities	$$10.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 80.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.00 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	50 entities	$$10.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 56.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.137 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

read_scaling_linkless

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	1 entities	$$10.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 60.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.21 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10 entities	$$10.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 56.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.128 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	100 entities	$$10.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 59.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.221 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	1000 entities	$$10.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 70.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.423 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10000 entities	$$10.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 63.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.663 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_entity

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/block/v/1`	$$11.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 72.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.32 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/book/v/1`	$$11.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 87.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.29 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/building/v/1`	$$11.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 61.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.542 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/organization/v/1`	$$11.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 84.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.83 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/page/v/2`	$$11.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 67.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.715 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/person/v/1`	$$11.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 66.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.61 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/playlist/v/1`	$$11.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 66.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.07 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/song/v/1`	$$11.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 111 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.432 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/uk-address/v/1`	$$11.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 67.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.50 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_entity_type

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
get_entity_type_by_id	Account ID: `bf5a9ef5-dc3b-43cf-a291-6210c0321eba`	$$8.64 \mathrm{ms} \pm 40.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.142 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_multiple_entities

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=0	0	$$58.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 651 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.257 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=255	1,resolve_depths=inherit:1;values:255;properties:255;links:127;link_dests:126;type:true	$$111 \mathrm{ms} \pm 796 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.532 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:0;link_dests:0;type:false	$$63.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 589 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.827 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$74.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 618 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.364 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$82.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 489 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.454 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:2;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$89.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 686 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.079 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=0	0	$$43.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 327 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.822 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=255	1,resolve_depths=inherit:1;values:255;properties:255;links:127;link_dests:126;type:true	$$74.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 552 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.45 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:0;link_dests:0;type:false	$$50.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 351 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.39 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$60.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 479 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.892 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$62.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 425 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.26 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:2;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$62.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 425 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.26 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$

scenarios

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
full_test	query-limited	$$130 \mathrm{ms} \pm 965 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}5.74 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
full_test	query-unlimited	$$140 \mathrm{ms} \pm 620 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}5.20 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
linked_queries	query-limited	$$24.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 142 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}32.4 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
linked_queries	query-unlimited	$$564 \mathrm{ms} \pm 1.42 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{red}5.93 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

hash-worker Bot enabled auto-merge May 13, 2026 00:01

hash-worker Bot assigned indietyp and TimDiekmann May 13, 2026

hash-worker Bot requested a review from a team May 13, 2026 00:01

github-actions Bot added the area/deps Relates to third-party dependencies (area) label May 13, 2026

augmentcode Bot reviewed May 13, 2026

View reviewed changes

vercel Bot deployed to Preview – hashdotdesign-tokens May 13, 2026 00:04 View deployment

vercel Bot deployed to Preview – petrinaut May 13, 2026 00:05 View deployment

vercel Bot deployed to Preview – hash May 13, 2026 00:14 View deployment

hash-worker Bot force-pushed the deps/rs/sentry-rust-monorepo branch from 5a787e6 to f24459b Compare May 18, 2026 12:19

vercel Bot deployed to Preview – hashdotdesign-tokens May 18, 2026 12:21 View deployment

vercel Bot deployed to Preview – petrinaut May 18, 2026 12:22 View deployment

vercel Bot deployed to Preview – hash May 18, 2026 12:31 View deployment

hash-worker Bot force-pushed the deps/rs/sentry-rust-monorepo branch from f24459b to 8a476b9 Compare May 25, 2026 09:37

vercel Bot deployed to Preview – hashdotdesign-tokens May 25, 2026 09:39 View deployment

vercel Bot deployed to Preview – petrinaut May 25, 2026 09:40 View deployment

vercel Bot deployed to Preview – hash May 25, 2026 09:50 View deployment

hash-worker Bot force-pushed the deps/rs/sentry-rust-monorepo branch from 8a476b9 to 7d28712 Compare June 15, 2026 22:55

vercel Bot deployed to Preview – hashdotdesign-tokens June 15, 2026 22:58 View deployment

vercel Bot deployed to Preview – petrinaut June 15, 2026 23:00 View deployment

vercel Bot deployed to Preview – hash June 15, 2026 23:09 View deployment

Update sentry-rust monorepo to 0.48.0

b72596a

hash-worker Bot force-pushed the deps/rs/sentry-rust-monorepo branch from 7d28712 to b72596a Compare June 24, 2026 09:53

vercel Bot deployed to Preview – hashdotdesign-tokens June 24, 2026 09:55 View deployment

vercel Bot deployed to Preview – petrinaut June 24, 2026 09:58 View deployment

vercel Bot deployed to Preview – hash June 24, 2026 10:06 View deployment

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Uh oh!

Update sentry-rust monorepo to 0.48.0#8715

Update sentry-rust monorepo to 0.48.0#8715
hash-worker[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
deps/rs/sentry-rust-monorepo

hash-worker Bot commented May 13, 2026 •

edited

Loading

Uh oh!

vercel Bot commented May 13, 2026 •

edited

Loading

Uh oh!

cursor Bot commented May 13, 2026 •

edited

Loading

Uh oh!

augmentcode Bot commented May 13, 2026

Uh oh!

augmentcode Bot left a comment

Uh oh!

codecov Bot commented May 13, 2026 •

edited

Loading

Uh oh!

codspeed-hq Bot commented May 13, 2026 •

edited

Loading

Uh oh!

github-actions Bot commented Jun 24, 2026

@rust/hash-graph-benches – Integrations

policy_resolution_large

policy_resolution_medium

policy_resolution_none

policy_resolution_small

read_scaling_complete

read_scaling_linkless

representative_read_entity

representative_read_entity_type

representative_read_multiple_entities

scenarios

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

2 participants

Uh oh!

Conversation

hash-worker Bot commented May 13, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Release Notes

v0.48.2

New Features

Fixes

v0.48.1

Fixes

v0.48.0

Breaking Changes

New Features

Fixes

Configuration

Uh oh!

vercel Bot commented May 13, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

cursor Bot commented May 13, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

PR Summary

Uh oh!

augmentcode Bot commented May 13, 2026

Uh oh!

augmentcode Bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

codecov Bot commented May 13, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Codecov Report

Uh oh!

codspeed-hq Bot commented May 13, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Merging this PR will degrade performance by 15.38%

Performance Changes

Uh oh!

github-actions Bot commented Jun 24, 2026

Benchmark results

@rust/hash-graph-benches – Integrations

policy_resolution_large

policy_resolution_medium

policy_resolution_none

policy_resolution_small

read_scaling_complete

read_scaling_linkless

representative_read_entity

representative_read_entity_type

representative_read_multiple_entities

scenarios

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

2 participants

hash-worker Bot commented May 13, 2026 •

edited

Loading

`v0.48.2`

`v0.48.1`

`v0.48.0`

vercel Bot commented May 13, 2026 •

edited

Loading

cursor Bot commented May 13, 2026 •

edited

Loading

codecov Bot commented May 13, 2026 •

edited

Loading

codspeed-hq Bot commented May 13, 2026 •

edited

Loading