Skip to content

[Uncollected Objects]Updated plugin[Gramps52]#140

Open
sam-m888 wants to merge 1 commit into
masterfrom
leakv2
Open

[Uncollected Objects]Updated plugin[Gramps52]#140
sam-m888 wants to merge 1 commit into
masterfrom
leakv2

Conversation

@sam-m888

@sam-m888 sam-m888 commented May 9, 2018

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Automatically finds reference cycles (loops)
Can display only objects in cycles (loops)
Can search for only objects in a particular cycle (loop)
Can switch from diagnostic to normal gc mode
garbage collection status is printed to STDERR when installed

Automatically finds reference cycles (loops)
Can display only objects in cycles (loops)
Can search for only objects in a particular cycle (loop)
Can switch from diagnostic to normal gc mode
garbage collection status is printed to STDERR when installed
@sam-m888 sam-m888 changed the base branch from maintenance/gramps50 to master September 26, 2019 03:06
@sam-m888 sam-m888 changed the title An updated version of Uncollected Objects plugin for Gramps50 [Uncollected Objects]Updated plugin[Gramps52] Sep 26, 2019
@sam-m888

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

@Nick-Hall For Gramps 5.2 can we remove the builtin "Uncollected Objects" plugin and use this updated one from the addons?

@PQYPLZXHGF

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@GaryGriffin

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Tried this gramplet on 6.1 . Errors:

2026-05-19 09:20:42.607: WARNING: _manager.py: line 328: Plugin error (from 'leakv2'): cannot import name 'get_primary_mask' from 'gramps.gui.utils' (Gramps6.1.app/Contents/Resources/lib/python3.14/site-packages/gramps/gui/utils.py)
2026-05-19 09:20:42.607: WARNING: grampletpane.py: line 191: Error loading gramplet 'Uncollected Objects V2': skipping content

(Gramps6.1.app:12766): Gdk-CRITICAL **: 09:20:47.097: gdk_atom_intern: assertion 'atom_name != NULL' failed

Is this gramplet still being considered given it is 7-9 years old and still an open PR?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants