Honest agent wording: deterministic -> constrained in system prompt#1
Merged
Conversation
The README was already clean, but the base-decision script's LLM system prompt still called Steward a 'deterministic DAO voting agent'. LLM output is not deterministic; the agent is constrained to the YES/NO/ABSTAIN schema. Corrects the wording per the audit. String literal only: no contract change, no redeploy, existing onchain proofs unaffected.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The README deterministic wording was already fixed (the submission-framing polish). This catches the one that was missed: the agent system prompt at
script/RequestHelloDecision.s.sol:19still said "a deterministic DAO voting agent."LLM output is not deterministic; the agent is constrained to the YES/NO/ABSTAIN allowed-value schema. Changed
deterministic->constrainedto match what the code actually enforces and to remove the overclaim a judge would catch when reading the code.String literal only: no contract change, no redeploy, no effect on the existing onchain proofs (already recorded). The third-party
lib/forge-stduses of "deterministic" are unrelated and untouched.