Skip to content

🛡️ Sentinel: [CRITICAL] Fix timing attack vulnerability in API token verification#33

Open
dkdev179 wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
sentinel-fix-timing-attack-4038169625846520875
Open

🛡️ Sentinel: [CRITICAL] Fix timing attack vulnerability in API token verification#33
dkdev179 wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
sentinel-fix-timing-attack-4038169625846520875

Conversation

@dkdev179

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

🚨 Severity: CRITICAL
💡 Vulnerability: The API token verification used standard string comparison (!=), which fails fast and leaks time information, allowing attackers to perform a timing attack to guess the token length and content.
🎯 Impact: An attacker could potentially brute-force or deduce the API token by analyzing the response times of the API requests, gaining unauthorized access to the application endpoints.
🔧 Fix: Used secrets.compare_digest to perform a constant-time comparison on the API token and the user-provided token, preventing the timing information leakage.
✅ Verification: Ran python -m pytest tests/test_api.py and the tests passed successfully, verifying that the authentication logic remains functionally identical while becoming secure.


PR created automatically by Jules for task 4038169625846520875 started by @dkdev179

…verification

Co-authored-by: dkdev179 <12934183+dkdev179@users.noreply.github.com>
@google-labs-jules

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

👋 Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request.

When you start a review, I'll add a 👀 emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down.

I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job!

For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with @jules. You can find this option in the Pull Request section of your global Jules UI settings. You can always switch back!

New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs.


For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant