Skip to content

Box ControlPair to reduce copy overhead#2753

Closed
Mark-Simulacrum wants to merge 1 commit into
aws:mainfrom
Mark-Simulacrum:control-pair-box
Closed

Box ControlPair to reduce copy overhead#2753
Mark-Simulacrum wants to merge 1 commit into
aws:mainfrom
Mark-Simulacrum:control-pair-box

Conversation

@Mark-Simulacrum

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Release Summary:

  • opt(s2n-quic-dc): optimize credential creation for TCP streams

Resolved issues:

n/a

Description of changes:

ControlPair is 2.5kb large (2 copies of the full HMAC state). That's maybe possible to shrink directly, but since we pass ControlPair around by value it's good to add some indirection to avoid copying the large value. The ControlPair is also not created at all in the TCP stream case, so this is a pure win there.

Not measured independently (currently that's a bit slow to do) but doesn't appear that this makes any meaningful end-to-end performance difference. Seems like a clear win for the TCP case though.

Call-outs:

n/a

Testing:

Existing tests cover the changes.

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache 2.0 license.

ControlPair is 2.5kb large (2 copies of the full HMAC state). That's
maybe possible to shrink directly, but since we pass ControlPair around
by value it's good to add some indirection to avoid copying the large
value. The ControlPair is also not created at all in the TCP stream
case, so this is a pure win there.

Not measured independently (currently that's a bit slow to do) but
doesn't appear that this makes any meaningful end-to-end performance
difference. Seems like a clear win for the TCP case though.
@Mark-Simulacrum
Mark-Simulacrum marked this pull request as ready for review August 13, 2025 21:46
@Mark-Simulacrum
Mark-Simulacrum marked this pull request as draft August 13, 2025 22:08
@Mark-Simulacrum

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

Actually, changes need to be deeper to be effective, we move out of the struct changed here pretty quickly. Will update the PR.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant