Support distinct-from predicates in Parquet pruning#22084
Open
Dandandan wants to merge 4 commits into
Open
Conversation
xudong963
approved these changes
May 11, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Which issue does this PR close?
Rationale for this change
Parquet statistics pruning did not rewrite
IS DISTINCT FROMorIS NOT DISTINCT FROM, so row groups that could be proven irrelevant from min/max and null-count statistics were still kept.What changes are included in this PR?
IS DISTINCT FROMandIS NOT DISTINCT FROM.Are these changes tested?
Are there any user-facing changes?
No API changes. Queries using
IS DISTINCT FROMandIS NOT DISTINCT FROMcan now benefit from Parquet statistics pruning.