Skip to content

CXF-9214 WSDLs and XSDs cannot be loaded from class path on GraalVM#3124

Merged
coheigea merged 1 commit into
apache:mainfrom
ppalaga:CXF-9214
May 20, 2026
Merged

CXF-9214 WSDLs and XSDs cannot be loaded from class path on GraalVM#3124
coheigea merged 1 commit into
apache:mainfrom
ppalaga:CXF-9214

Conversation

@ppalaga
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@ppalaga ppalaga commented May 19, 2026

@ffang
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

ffang commented May 19, 2026

Hi @coheigea ,

Could you please take a look if this is also good for you?
And do you think we should re-cut the release to include this fix?

Thanks!
Freeman

@ppalaga
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

ppalaga commented May 19, 2026

.oO( There is so many nicer things to do in life then figure out why checkstyle failed. There is a few good code formatters for Java, that do not require any attention. )

@ppalaga
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

ppalaga commented May 19, 2026

A workaround in Camel Quarkus is possible quarkiverse/quarkus-cxf#2144
I do not think the CXF release train needs to get stopped.

ppalaga added a commit to quarkiverse/quarkus-cxf that referenced this pull request May 19, 2026
…SDs cannot be loaded from class path on GraalVM, see also apache/cxf#3124
@coheigea
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@ffang As we have a workaround for Quarkus, I'd say let's just go ahead with the current votes. We'll likely be releasing quite often over the next while with all the AI related findings.

@coheigea coheigea merged commit a82bbfc into apache:main May 20, 2026
4 of 5 checks passed
coheigea pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 20, 2026
@ppalaga
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

ppalaga commented May 20, 2026

Should I send separate PRs to maintenance branches (which)?

@coheigea
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

No thanks, I already backported to 4.1.x-fixes 760945f

@ffang
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

ffang commented May 20, 2026

@ffang As we have a workaround for Quarkus, I'd say let's just go ahead with the current votes. We'll likely be releasing quite often over the next while with all the AI related findings.

Thanks @coheigea !

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants