Skip to content

feat: rate limit + retry config flag for initial queues#105

Open
System-Glitch wants to merge 1 commit into
aertje:masterfrom
System-Glitch:feat/initial-queue-rate-limit
Open

feat: rate limit + retry config flag for initial queues#105
System-Glitch wants to merge 1 commit into
aertje:masterfrom
System-Glitch:feat/initial-queue-rate-limit

Conversation

@System-Glitch

@System-Glitch System-Glitch commented Feb 24, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Relates to #101 and #91

This PR adds some flags to the main command to let users configure the default rate limiting and retry config for queues created with the -queue flag.

This is useful when using the docker image in codebases that can't (or don't want to) create queues manually.

This lacks granularity as this applies to all initial queues, but it should cover the most common use cases. I thinks that if you need that kind of granularity, you should create the queues programmatically anyway.

@fahmifan

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Will this get merged?

@System-Glitch

System-Glitch commented Aug 28, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

FYI I forked this repository, merged a few PRs (#105, #104, #59) and updated dependencies (the project was using a ton of deprecated imports).

https://github.com/System-Glitch/cloud-tasks-emulator

I made an updated docker image available.

@pedr0sorio

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Thanks for implementing this @System-Glitch ! It will be handy for me :)

However, the link to the docker image seems broken, could you reshare it?

@System-Glitch

System-Glitch commented Mar 5, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

@pedr0sorio

Thanks for implementing this @System-Glitch ! It will be handy for me :)

However, the link to the docker image seems broken, could you reshare it?

Here it is: https://github.com/System-Glitch/cloud-tasks-emulator/pkgs/container/cloud-tasks-emulator

I updated it in the original comment too.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants