🧪 Add test coverage for Super factorial logic#40
Conversation
Wrapped the interactive root-level logic in Super factorial.py inside an `if __name__ == '__main__':` block to prevent blocking upon import. Created a unittest file `test_super_factorial.py` that dynamically imports `Super factorial.py` to test the `part1` logic across various scenarios including 0, 1, small numbers, and a large number. Tested locally. Co-authored-by: ManupaKDU <95234271+ManupaKDU@users.noreply.github.com>
|
👋 Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request. When you start a review, I'll add a 👀 emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down. I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job! For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs. For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task. |
1 participant
🎯 What: The
part1factorial logic inPart-1/Hackerrank/Super factorial.pywas missing test coverage. The file was also unimportable due to root-level interactiveinput().📊 Coverage: Refactored
Super factorial.pyto be safely importable. Added unit tests for edge cases (0, 1), standard small values, and a larger factor.✨ Result: Enhanced test coverage and ensured the core logic in
Super factorial.pyis verified without regressions.PR created automatically by Jules for task 16446850278009927906 started by @ManupaKDU