Skip to content

WIP - DSL for entities#60

Closed
Kwestor wants to merge 2 commits into
v0.6.x-slick-2.1.xfrom
wip/dsl-for-entities
Closed

WIP - DSL for entities#60
Kwestor wants to merge 2 commits into
v0.6.x-slick-2.1.xfrom
wip/dsl-for-entities

Conversation

@Kwestor

@Kwestor Kwestor commented Feb 19, 2015

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

A new way of defining entities.

Fully compatible with old one, you don't have to migrate anything.

TODO:

  • document new classes
  • remove duplication in tests
  • document new DSL in README

Big thanks to @romanowski for the idea and implementation for this feature!

@coveralls

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Coverage Status

Coverage decreased (-0.51%) to 96.3% when pulling bf4de54 on wip/dsl-for-entities into b234987 on v0.6.x-slick-2.1.x.

@Kwestor Kwestor force-pushed the wip/dsl-for-entities branch from bf4de54 to 55c3c6f Compare February 19, 2015 10:53
@coveralls

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 96.81% when pulling 55c3c6f on wip/dsl-for-entities into b234987 on v0.6.x-slick-2.1.x.

@romanowski

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

I vote to close this in favor of #88

@JakubSroka

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

probably won't be developed since it was not touched for 6 years now

@JakubSroka JakubSroka closed this Jul 9, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants