site: publish 9 agentic-governance insights (June 2026 wave 2)#185
Merged
Conversation
…6 wave 2) Eight new insights scoped from the June Post- threads, each anchored on a named external report or announcement per ADR-015, with isBasedOn schema, verified primary-source claims, outbound references, hub cards, sitemap entries, and rendered OG images: - AI Adoption Maturity Model (CMU SEI + Accenture v1.0) - BCG: To Thrive in the AI Era (operating models / governance gap) - IBM 2026 Tech Leader Study (77% governance-outpaced finding) - GitHub: Agent pull requests are everywhere (review is the wrong layer) - Anthropic: Claude Code Skills (knowledge leaving the prompt) - Bain: The Rise of the AI Development Life Cycle (AI-DLC governance) - Microsoft Project Solara (post-app computing governance) - Microsoft/GitHub agent platform (Agent HQ, ACS, Agent 365) Validators: check_insights (95 registered), check_nav_footer, check_encoding all pass. Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
mneme self-governance checkMode: Summary: 6 pass, 0 warn, 22 fail, 0 unknown
Details
|
…k AI Index) Ninth article from the June Post- scopes: concept piece (per ADR-015 this is NOT report-anchored) using Glean Work AI Institute Work AI Index 2026 as supporting evidence. Verified stats only: 11 hrs saved vs 6.4 hrs botsitting, 37% of AI time, 2.3/2.2/1.7 hr breakdown, 41% unexplainable work, 54% policy bypass, 13% org improvement, 6,000 workers US/UK/AU. Engineer-specific stats from the scope (89%/39%/43%) are absent from the published report and were dropped. Registered: sitemap, hub card + hasPart, OG template + rendered png. Validators: check_insights (96), nav-footer, encoding all pass. Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
TheoV823
changed the title
…cles Cannibalization-audit follow-up: each new entity-anchored article already linked to its closest existing sibling; this adds the inbound link back (skills->Claude Skills, endpoint->Solara, PR-incident->GitHub agent PRs, governance-by-design->IBM study, AI SDLC->Bain AI-DLC, review-scaling-> verification tax) so the clusters consolidate instead of competing. One-line insertion per page; validators all pass. Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
Publishes the insights scoped in the June "Post-" ChatGPT threads: the eight threads above the
****Post-Rule Files vs Retrieval Memorymarker, plus the newly scoped "Post-AI Adoption and Mneme" thread (Glean verification tax). Eight are report-anchored per ADR-015; the ninth is a concept piece that cites its report as supporting evidence (ADR-015 classification applied deliberately).Verification
check_insights.py(96 insights fully registered),check_nav_footer.py(212 pages OK),check_encoding.py— all pass.Squash-merge with the PR title per repo policy.
🤖 Generated with Claude Code