feat: implement non-UI execution contract for deal-lead-mail-tracker#1432
Open
dev-king-001 wants to merge 5 commits into
Open
feat: implement non-UI execution contract for deal-lead-mail-tracker#1432dev-king-001 wants to merge 5 commits into
dev-king-001 wants to merge 5 commits into
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
PR Title:
feat: implement non-UI execution contract for deal-lead-mail-tracker
PR Description:
What was done
DealLeadTrackerInputandDealLeadTrackerOutput) along with standard error codes and boundaries.executeDealLeadMailTrackerinservice.tsand wired it up viaindex.ts.successFixtureandfailureFixtureMissingInput) that cover basic success and validation failure cases.Why it was done
deal-lead-mail-trackertool needed a stable backend-facing contract to run independently of presentation concerns, ensuring reliable execution gaps are covered before further UI integration.How it was verified
Closes #1364