AssignReviewers: skip people who are out, from the Rippling PTO calendar

[willson556]

AssignReviewers now skips anyone the Rippling PTO calendar has out today or on the next business day, instead of anyone whose GitHub status is Busy. The team doesn't set GitHub status, so the old check never skipped anyone. This is part of Proposal 1 of the review throughput RFC, and it's the out-of-office source Proposal 2's SLA job will use (rollout plan).

Calendar entry	Counts as out
<name> is Out of Office	Yes
<name> on <leave type>, such as Vacation or Sick Leave	Yes
<name> on Work From Home	No

"Next business day" skips weekends and the company paid holidays in ReviewConfig/holidays.json, so a review assigned the Wednesday before Thanksgiving isn't given to someone out the following Monday.

New shared folder, ReviewConfig/:

• pto.js reads the iCalendar feed: all-day and timed entries, folded lines, escaped text. It matches names to GitHub logins through a people map, ignoring case and extra spaces.
• holidays.json holds 2026's 11 company paid holidays. Next year's list is added by hand; a year with no list is a warning on every run.

This repo is public, so the people map isn't here. It's the org variable REVIEW_PEOPLE: JSON mapping each login to a name as Rippling shows it, optional aliases (a legal name other systems use, say), and a slack member ID for Proposal 2's reminders. Fixtures and examples use made-up names.

New inputs, both optional:

pto-calendar-url: ${{ secrets.PTO_CALENDAR_URL }}
people: ${{ vars.REVIEW_PEOPLE }}

Without them nobody is skipped, so existing callers keep working until they add the two lines. This repo's own caller, added in the PR below this one, is the first to pass them. Until this merges, that caller still uses AssignReviewers@main, so its runs log an "Unexpected input" warning and skip nobody. If the feed can't be fetched, or the map is missing or isn't valid JSON, the action warns and assigns as before. It never fails the run. The feed URL carries a token, so neither it nor an error that might quote it is logged.

Testing:

• node --test AssignReviewers/ ReviewConfig/: 34 cases. They cover out today, out next business day, Work From Home, time off further out, weekends and holidays, timed entries across the UTC date line, aliases, a failed fetch that mustn't log the URL, and a missing or broken people map. The test workflow now also runs on changes to ReviewConfig/.
• Not yet run against the real feed. Once this merges, the five caller workflows (StaflLib, coit-tower-bms2000, goldengate-bms2000-string, stafl-bms2000-template, anza-bms2000) each get a PR adding the two inputs.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

[willson556]

• Pick reviewers more fairly: own PRs don't count as load, ties go to the longest wait #45
• Add the scheduled ReviewSLA job: comments, reminders, digest, dashboard #44
• Add ReviewSLA step 1: first-response clocks and report mode #43
• AssignReviewers: skip people who are out, from the Rippling PTO calendar #41 👈 (View in Graphite)
• Assign reviewers on this repo's own PRs #42
• main

This stack of pull requests is managed by Graphite. Learn more about stacking.

[staflsystemsci]

Review SLA

Assignee	Owes	Due
fcheein	First response	Fri Oct 2, 15:24 PT	Overdue

_{Due times are in business hours, 10:00 to 17:00 Pacific: 4 h for a PR under 250 added lines, 7 h otherwise, and 4 h for a re-review. Mid-stack, an assignee owes a response on the lowest PR they haven't approved. Dashboard}

[willson556]

Merge activity

• Oct 2, 10:56 PM UTC: A user started a stack merge that includes this pull request via Graphite.
• Oct 2, 10:56 PM UTC: @willson556 merged this pull request with Graphite.