Skip to content

Sriti-Sancharika-prof/boost-converter-feedforward-control

Repository files navigation

Boost Converter with Feedforward Control (MATLAB/Simulink)

Design and simulation of a DC–DC boost converter using feedforward duty-cycle compensation to improve transient response, voltage regulation, and disturbance rejection under input variations.


Overview

This project focuses on the system-level modeling and simulation of a DC–DC boost converter in MATLAB/Simulink. The study evaluates the effectiveness of feedforward control in improving converter dynamic performance during startup and parameter variation.

Comparative analysis is performed between open-loop operation and feedforward-assisted control to observe improvements in output voltage stabilization and transient response.


System Model

The boost converter is implemented using standard Simulink power electronics blocks.

The model includes:

  • DC input voltage source
  • Controlled switching device
  • Diode
  • Inductor
  • Output capacitor
  • Resistive load
  • Feedforward control path for duty-cycle adjustment

The work focuses on system-level dynamic behavior, not device-level switching losses or transistor modeling.


Feedforward Control Strategy

Without Feedforward Control

  • Fixed duty cycle operation
  • Slower output voltage rise
  • Higher transient deviation
  • Regulation dependent on passive component values

With Feedforward Control

  • Duty cycle dynamically adjusted based on system conditions
  • Faster transient response
  • Improved steady-state voltage regulation
  • Reduced sensitivity to input disturbances

Parameter Variation Study

The effect of inductance on converter dynamics is analyzed.

  • L = 15.625 mH → Faster response, higher ripple
  • L = 100 mH → Reduced ripple, moderate response speed
  • L = 150 mH → Smoothest waveform, increased settling time

This demonstrates the trade-off between dynamic speed and output ripple.


Simulation Results

Output Without Feedforward Control

Without Feedforward

Feedforward Control Response (L = 15.625 mH)

L15

Feedforward Control Response (L = 100 mH)

L100

Feedforward Control Response (L = 150 mH)

L150


Key Learnings

  • Feedforward duty-cycle compensation improves transient performance
  • Inductor value significantly affects ripple and settling time
  • Simulation modeling enables early design exploration before hardware realization

Tools Used

  • MATLAB
  • Simulink

Future Scope

  • Closed-loop PI/PID controller design
  • Small-signal stability modeling
  • Efficiency and switching loss estimation
  • Hardware implementation using PWM controller
  • Digital control realization

Author

Sriti Sancharika
VLSI | DSP | FPGA | Power Electronics

About

MATLAB/Simulink-based modeling and control analysis of a DC–DC boost converter using feedforward duty-cycle compensation for improved transient response and output voltage regulation.

Topics

Resources

Stars

0 stars

Watchers

1 watching

Forks

Releases

No releases published

Packages

 
 
 

Contributors