Skip to content

UI: Improve Streamlit onboarding, UX, and error handling#91

Open
Sandeep-Kumar-930 wants to merge 1 commit into
SGCODEX:contributionfrom
Sandeep-Kumar-930:ui-streamlit-improvements
Open

UI: Improve Streamlit onboarding, UX, and error handling#91
Sandeep-Kumar-930 wants to merge 1 commit into
SGCODEX:contributionfrom
Sandeep-Kumar-930:ui-streamlit-improvements

Conversation

@Sandeep-Kumar-930

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Summary

This PR improves the Streamlit web interface to make the project more beginner-friendly and robust without modifying any core ML or emotion-detection logic.

Changes Made

  • Added clear onboarding instructions for first-time users
  • Improved page title, layout, and overall UI clarity
  • Added safe error handling for missing model files and webcam access
  • Minor UX refinements for buttons and layout consistency

Testing

  • Manually tested Streamlit UI
  • Verified application starts without errors
  • Confirmed no changes to emotion detection or model logic

Notes

This PR aligns with project goals of improving usability, onboarding, and real-world open-source contribution quality.

@vercel

vercel Bot commented Jan 28, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@Sandeep-Kumar-930 is attempting to deploy a commit to the Shivam Gupta's projects Team on Vercel.

A member of the Team first needs to authorize it.

@Sandeep-Kumar-930

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

Hi maintainers 👋

The failing Vercel check seems to be due to deployment authorization on forks.
This PR only contains UI and onboarding improvements and does not affect deployment logic.

Please let me know if any changes are needed from my side.
Thanks for reviewing!

@Sandeep-Kumar-930

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

Hyy Admin PlS Merged My PRs And Add on My profile, Pls count it

@Sandeep-Kumar-930

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

Hi @Shivamgupta4651,

Thanks for reviewing and approving the PR 🙏

It looks like the Vercel check is failing due to fork deployment authorization.
Since this PR only contains UI and onboarding improvements and does not affect build configuration, could you please advise whether the check can be re-run or temporarily bypassed?

Happy to make any required adjustments.

Thank you!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants