fix(deps): update dependency axios to v1.16.0 [security]#512
Open
renovate[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
fix(deps): update dependency axios to v1.16.0 [security]#512renovate[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
renovate[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
Contributor
Build ReportPlease note:
|
5d2fc51 to
d328c98
Compare
d328c98 to
c28d1f5
Compare
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR contains the following updates:
1.15.2→1.16.0Warning
Some dependencies could not be looked up. Check the Dependency Dashboard for more information.
Axios has a Patch Bypass: Proxy-Authorization Header Injection via Prototype Pollution — Incomplete Null-Prototype Fix
CVE-2026-44489 / GHSA-654m-c8p4-x5fp
More information
Details
[Patch Bypass] Proxy-Authorization Header Injection via Prototype Pollution — Incomplete Null-Prototype Fix in Axios 1.15.2
Summary
The
Object.create(null)fix introduced in Axios 1.15.2 (GHSA-q8qp-cvcw-x6jj) protects the top-level config object from prototype pollution. However, nested objects created byutils.merge()(e.g.,config.proxy) are still constructed as plain{}withObject.prototypein their chain.The
setProxy()function atlib/adapters/http.js:209-223readsproxy.username,proxy.password, andproxy.authwithouthasOwnPropertychecks. WhenObject.prototype.usernameis polluted,setProxy()constructs aProxy-Authorizationheader with attacker-controlled credentials and injects it into every proxied HTTP request.Severity: Medium (CVSS 5.4)
Affected Versions: 1.15.2 (and potentially 1.15.1)
Vulnerable Component:
lib/adapters/http.js(setProxy()) +lib/utils.js(merge())CWE
CVSS 3.1
Score: 5.6 (Medium)
Vector:
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:Lconfig.proxy. Unlike GHSA-q8qp-cvcw-x6jj which affected all requests unconditionallyconfig.baseURLhijack)Why This Is Lower Severity Than GHSA-q8qp-cvcw-x6jj (7.4 High)
config.proxysetconfig.baseURLPPconfig.authPPAuthorizationto target serverProxy-Authorizationto proxyThis Is a Patch Bypass
This vulnerability bypasses the fix introduced in Axios 1.15.2 for GHSA-q8qp-cvcw-x6jj. The fix correctly uses
Object.create(null)for the config object, blocking direct prototype pollution onconfig.proxy,config.auth, etc.However, the fix is incomplete: when a user legitimately sets
config.proxy = { host: 'proxy.corp', port: 8080 }, themergeConfig()function passes this object throughutils.merge(), which creates a new plain{}object (lib/utils.js:406: const result = {};). This new object inherits fromObject.prototype, re-opening the prototype pollution attack surface on the nested proxy object.config(top-level)Object.create(null)config.proxy(nested)utils.merge()→const result = {}setProxy()readsproxy.username,proxy.authwithouthasOwnPropertyRoot Cause Analysis
Step 1:
utils.merge()creates plain{}for nested objectsFile:
lib/utils.js, line 406When
mergeConfig()processesconfig.proxy,getMergedValue()callsutils.merge(), which creates a plain{}for the nested object. This plain object inherits fromObject.prototype.Step 2:
setProxy()reads proxy properties withouthasOwnPropertyFile:
lib/adapters/http.js, lines 209-223Complete Attack Chain
Proof of Concept
Reproduction Environment
Reproduction Steps
Verified PoC Output
Confirming the Bypass Mechanism
Fix 2: Use null-prototype objects in
utils.merge()Fix 3 (Comprehensive): Apply null-prototype to all objects created by
getMergedValue()References
Severity
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:NReferences
This data is provided by the GitHub Advisory Database (CC-BY 4.0).
axios has DoS & Header Injection via Prototype Pollution Read-Side Gadgets in axios merge functions
CVE-2026-44490 / GHSA-898c-q2cr-xwhg
More information
Details
Summary
axios
1.15.2exposes two read-side prototype-pollution gadgets. WhenObject.prototypeis polluted by an upstream dependency in the same process (e.g. lodash_.merge/ CVE-2018-16487), axios silently picks up the polluted values:lib/utils.jsline 406 buildsmerge()'s accumulator asresult = {}, soresult[targetKey](line 414) walksObject.prototypeand the polluted bucket's own keys are copied into the merged headers and ride out on the wire.lib/core/mergeConfig.jsline 26 builds thehasOwnPropertydescriptor as a plain-object literal.Object.definePropertyreadsdescriptor.get/descriptor.setvia the prototype chain, so a pollutedObject.prototype.getorObject.prototype.setmakes the call throwTypeErrorsynchronously on every axios request.Affected Properties
Object.prototype.commonObject.prototype.delete/.head/.post/.put/.patch/.queryObject.prototype.getTypeError: Getter must be a functionfrommergeConfig.js:26Object.prototype.setTypeError: Setter must be a functionfrommergeConfig.js:26Per-request headers (
axios.request(url, { headers: {...} })) overwrite polluted entries. PollutingObject.prototype.gettriggers the crash before any header is built.Proof of Concept
Impact
Content-Length: 99999): receiver waits for a body that never arrives. Affects requests with a body.Transfer-Encoding: chunkedrides alongside axios's autoContent-Length): receiver rejects with400 Bad Request. Affects requests with a body.If-None-Match: *): receiver returns empty304 Not Modified. Affects GET / HEAD.Object.prototype.get/.set): every axios request fails synchronously withTypeError, notAxiosError, so handlers filtering onerror.isAxiosErrormishandle the failure.Attack Flow
flowchart TD ROOT["Polluted Object.prototype<br/>via upstream gadget (e.g. lodash <= 4.17.10 _.merge / CVE-2018-16487)<br/>axios <= 1.15.2"] ROOT --> CLASS_A["A. Arbitrary HTTP Header Injection<br/>Polluted defaults.headers slot rides along on every outbound axios request"] ROOT --> CLASS_B["B. Crash DoS via Object.prototype.get / .set<br/>Polluted descriptor breaks Object.defineProperty in mergeConfig"] CLASS_A --> PRE_A["Precondition: header not set per-request by the app<br/>Injected via defaults.headers slot<br/>(common, delete, head, post, put, patch, query)"] PRE_A --> PA1["Response Suppression<br/>Trigger: common = {If-None-Match: *}<br/>Affects GET / HEAD"] PA1 --> SA1["DoS<br/>304 Not Modified empty"] PRE_A --> PA2["Server Hang<br/>Trigger: common = {Content-Length: 99999}<br/>Affects requests with body"] PA2 --> SA2["DoS<br/>connection hang"] PRE_A --> PA3["CL+TE Conflict<br/>Trigger: common = {Transfer-Encoding: chunked}<br/>Affects requests with body"] PA3 --> SA3["DoS<br/>400 Bad Request"] CLASS_B --> SB1["DoS<br/>TypeError: Getter / Setter must be a function<br/>Crashes every axios request, not only GET"] %% Styles style ROOT fill:#f87171,stroke:#​991b1b,color:#fff style CLASS_A fill:#fb923c,stroke:#​9a3412,color:#fff style CLASS_B fill:#fb923c,stroke:#​9a3412,color:#fff style PRE_A fill:#e2e8f0,stroke:#​64748b,color:#​1e293b style PA1 fill:#fbbf24,stroke:#​92400e,color:#​000 style PA2 fill:#fbbf24,stroke:#​92400e,color:#​000 style PA3 fill:#fbbf24,stroke:#​92400e,color:#​000 style SA1 fill:#ef4444,stroke:#​991b1b,color:#fff style SA2 fill:#ef4444,stroke:#​991b1b,color:#fff style SA3 fill:#ef4444,stroke:#​991b1b,color:#fff style SB1 fill:#ef4444,stroke:#​991b1b,color:#fffRoot Cause
Finding A.
lib/utils.js:404-429'smerge()createsresult = {}at line 406. The dangerous-keys filter on lines 408-411 blocks the write side, but the read at line 414 (isPlainObject(result[targetKey])) still walks the prototype chain. WhentargetKeymatches a polluted slot,result[targetKey]returns the polluted nested object, and the recursivemerge(result[targetKey], val)on line 415 iterates that object's own keys viaforEachand copies them as own properties into the new accumulator. Those keys flow throughmergeConfig.js:35→Axios.js:148(utils.merge(headers.common, headers[config.method])) →Axios.js:155(AxiosHeaders.concat(...)) → onto the wire viahttp.js:677(headers: headers.toJSON()) →http.js:767(transport.request(options, ...)).Finding B.
lib/core/mergeConfig.js:25correctly makesconfig = Object.create(null), but the descriptor passed on line 26 is a plain-object literal - itsget/setlookups walkObject.prototype. A polluted non-functionObject.prototype.getor.setmakesObject.definePropertythrowTypeError: Getter must be a function(orSetter must be a function) before the call returns. The descriptor is built unconditionally on everymergeConfiginvocation, so every axios request throws - POST, PUT, DELETE, PATCH, HEAD, QUERY, not only GET.Suggested Fix
Use null-prototype objects in place of the plain-object literals at
lib/utils.js:406andlib/core/mergeConfig.js:26-31. The same descriptor pattern recurs atlib/core/AxiosError.js:37,lib/core/AxiosHeaders.js:100,lib/utils.js:447/454/492/498, andlib/adapters/adapters.js:28/32.Resources
lodash.mergeprototype pollution inlodash <= 4.17.10Severity
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:LReferences
This data is provided by the GitHub Advisory Database (CC-BY 4.0).
axios's shouldBypassProxy does not recognize IPv4-mapped IPv6 addresses, allowing NO_PROXY bypass (incomplete fix for CVE-2025-62718)
CVE-2026-44492 / GHSA-pjwm-pj3p-43mv
More information
Details
Summary
shouldBypassProxy, introduced in v1.15.0 to fix CVE-2025-62718, does not normalise IPv4-mapped IPv6 addresses. When NO_PROXY lists an IPv4 address such as
127.0.0.1or169.254.169.254, a request URL using the IPv4-mapped IPv6 form (::ffff:7f00:1,::ffff:a9fe:a9fe) still routes through the configured proxy. Node.js resolves these addresses to the underlying IPv4 host, so the request reaches the internal service via the proxy rather than being blocked.Details
lib/helpers/shouldBypassProxy.js (v1.15.0):
The WHATWG URL parser canonicalises
http://[::ffff:127.0.0.1]/to hostname[::ffff:7f00:1]. After bracket-stripping:::ffff:7f00:1. This string does not match 127.0.0.1 in NO_PROXY and is not in LOOPBACK_ADDRESSES, so shouldBypassProxy returns false and the proxy is used. proxy-from-env (called before shouldBypassProxy) has the same gap - it does not equate ::ffff:7f00:1 with 127.0.0.1 - so neither layer catches the bypass.PoC
Node.js routes ::ffff:7f00:1 to 127.0.0.1:
Cloud metadata SSRF: ::ffff:a9fe:a9fe = ::ffff:169.254.169.254. If NO_PROXY=169.254.169.254 is set to block IMDS access, a request to http://[::ffff:a9fe:a9fe]/latest/meta-data/ bypasses it.
Fix
Canonicalise IPv4-mapped IPv6 in normalizeNoProxyHost before any comparison:
Impact
Any application that sets NO_PROXY to exclude internal or metadata endpoints and uses an HTTP/HTTPS proxy can have those exclusions bypassed by a URL using IPv4-mapped IPv6 notation. The attacker must control the request URL. In cloud environments with instance metadata services, this can lead to credential exfiltration.
Severity
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:NReferences
This data is provided by the GitHub Advisory Database (CC-BY 4.0).
axios Vulnerable to Full Man-in-the-Middle via Prototype Pollution Gadget in
config.proxyCVE-2026-44494 / GHSA-35jp-ww65-95wh
More information
Details
Vulnerability Disclosure: Full Man-in-the-Middle via Prototype Pollution Gadget in
config.proxySummary
The Axios library is vulnerable to a Prototype Pollution "Gadget" attack that allows any
Object.prototypepollution in the application's dependency tree to be escalated into a full Man-in-the-Middle (MITM) attack — intercepting, reading, and modifying all HTTP traffic including authentication credentials.The HTTP adapter at
lib/adapters/http.js:670readsconfig.proxyvia standard property access, which traverses the prototype chain. Becauseproxyis not present in Axios defaults, the merged config object has no ownproxyproperty, making it trivially injectable via prototype pollution. Once injected,setProxy()routes all HTTP requests through the attacker's proxy server.Unlike the
transformResponsegadget (which is constrained byassertOptionsto returntrue), the proxy gadget has zero constraints — the attacker gets a full MITM position with the ability to read all credentials and tamper with all responses.Severity: Critical (CVSS 9.4)
Affected Versions: All versions (v0.x - v1.x including v1.15.0)
Vulnerable Component:
lib/adapters/http.js(config property access on merged object)CWE
CVSS 3.1
Score: 9.4 (Critical)
Vector:
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:LObject.prototype.proxy = {host:'attacker', port:8080}. Consistent with GHSA-fvcv-3m26-pcqx scoring methodologytransformResponsewhich must returntrueWhy This Bypasses mergeConfig
The critical difference from
transformResponse: theproxyproperty is not in defaults (lib/defaults/index.jsdoes not setproxy). This means:mergeConfigiteratesObject.keys({...defaults, ...userConfig})—proxyis NOT in this setdefaultToConfig2forproxyis never calledproxypropertyhttp.js:670readsconfig.proxy, JavaScript traverses the prototype chainObject.prototype.proxyis found → used bysetProxy()This is a more direct attack path than
transformResponsebecause it doesn't even go throughmergeConfig's merge logic — it completely bypasses it.Usage of "Helper" Vulnerabilities
This vulnerability requires Zero Direct User Input.
If an attacker can pollute
Object.prototypevia any other library in the stack (e.g.,qs,minimist,lodash,body-parser), Axios will automatically use the pollutedproxyvalue when making HTTP requests. The developer's code is completely safe — no configuration errors needed.Proof of Concept
1. The Setup (Simulated Pollution)
Imagine a scenario where a known prototype pollution vulnerability exists in a query parser. The attacker sends a payload that sets:
2. The Gadget Trigger (Safe Code)
The application makes a completely safe, hardcoded request:
3. The Execution
At
http.js:668-670:setProxy()athttp.js:191-239then:4. The Impact (Full MITM)
The attacker's proxy server receives:
The
Authorizationheader containssvc-account:prod-key-abc123!in Base64. The attacker:5. Verified PoC Code
Verified PoC Output
Impact Analysis
Authorizationheader, cookies, API keys, and request bodies are visible to the attacker's proxy in plaintext.transformResponse's "must return true".Why This Is More Severe Than transformResponse (axios_26)
this.auth+ response datatruetrue(suspicious)Recommended Fix
Fix 1: Use
hasOwnPropertywhen reading security-sensitive config propertiesFix 2: Enumerate all properties not in defaults and apply
hasOwnPropertyProperties not in defaults that are read by http.js and have security impact:
config.proxy— MITMconfig.socketPath— Unix socket SSRFconfig.transport— request hijackconfig.lookup— DNS hijackconfig.beforeRedirect— redirect manipulationconfig.httpAgent/config.httpsAgent— agent injectionAll should use
hasOwnPropertychecks.Fix 3: Use null-prototype object for merged config
Resources
Timeline
Severity
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:NReferences
This data is provided by the GitHub Advisory Database (CC-BY 4.0).
Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling in Axios
CVE-2026-44488 / GHSA-777c-7fjr-54vf
More information
Details
Summary
Axios versions
1.7.0through1.15.xdid not enforce configured request and response size limits when requests were sent with thefetchadapter. Applications that selectedadapter: 'fetch', or ran in environments where axios resolved to the fetch adapter, could receive or send bodies larger thanmaxContentLengthormaxBodyLengthdespite those limits being explicitly configured.This can cause resource exhaustion in server-side usage when a malicious or compromised server returns an oversized response, when an attacker can supply a large
data:URL, or when an application forwards attacker-controlled request bodies through axios while relying onmaxBodyLengthas a boundary.Impact
The impact is availability-only. Affected applications may process, buffer, or transmit data beyond the configured limit, potentially exhausting memory, CPU, or network resources.
This does not affect axios’s default unlimited behaviour by itself:
maxContentLengthandmaxBodyLengthdefault to-1. The vulnerability exists when an application has configured finite limits and expects axios to enforce them.Server-side runtimes are the primary concern. Browser impact is generally constrained by the browser process and browser fetch behavior, and should not be described as server process exhaustion.
Affected Functionality
Affected functionality includes requests using the built-in
fetchadapter with finitemaxContentLengthormaxBodyLengthvalues.Relevant configurations include:
adapter: 'fetch'adapter: ['fetch', ...]whenfetchis selectedxhrnorhttpis available and axios falls back tofetchenv.fetchUnaffected functionality includes:
httpadapter enforcementTechnical Details
In vulnerable versions,
lib/adapters/fetch.jsdestructured request config withoutmaxContentLengthormaxBodyLength. The adapter dispatchedfetch()and then materialized the response throughtext(),arrayBuffer(),blob(), or related resolvers without checking the configured response limit.The fix in
e5540dcadded:maxContentLengthandmaxBodyLengthreads inlib/adapters/fetch.jsdata:URL decoded-size checksContent-Lengthresponse pre-checksReadableStreamtests/unit/adapters/fetch.test.jsProof of Concept of Attack
Workarounds
Use the Node.js
httpadapter for server-side requests where finite size limits are security-relevant.Validate or cap attacker-controlled request bodies before passing them to axios.
Reject or strictly allowlist attacker-controlled URL schemes, especially
data:URLs, before calling axios.Original Report
Summary
When Axios is used with adapter: 'fetch', configured body/response size limits are not enforced. This allows oversized uploads/downloads (including data: URLs) despite explicit limits, which can lead to memory/resource exhaustion in server-side usage.
Details
maxBodyLength and maxContentLength are not applied in the fetch adapter flow:
By contrast, the HTTP adapter enforces both limits.
PoC
Environment:
Steps:
Expected secure behavior: both requests rejected.
Observed:
Impact
Type: DoS / resource exhaustion due to limit bypass.
Impacted: applications using Axios fetch adapter as a server-side security control boundary for untrusted request/response sizes.
Severity
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:HReferences
This data is provided by the GitHub Advisory Database (CC-BY 4.0).
Axios: Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS) via Cookie Name Injection
CVE-2026-44496 / GHSA-hfxv-24rg-xrqf
More information
Details
Summary
Axios versions before
0.32.0on the0.xline and before1.16.0on the1.xline build a regular expression from the configured XSRF cookie name without escaping regex metacharacters. In standard browser environments, an attacker who can influence the cookie name passed to axios can cause expensive regex backtracking while axios readsdocument.cookie.The practical impact is client-side availability degradation, such as freezing the affected browser tab while axios prepares a request. The issue does not affect ordinary Node.js HTTP adapter usage, React Native, or web workers, where axios does not read
document.cookie.Impact
Applications are affected only when attacker-controlled data can reach the XSRF cookie name configuration or a direct/unsafe call to the internal cookie helper.
This does not expose credentials, modify requests, or affect response integrity. The impact is availability only.
Affected Functionality
Affected code paths:
lib/helpers/cookies.jsread(name)in standard browser environments.lib/helpers/resolveConfig.jsin1.x, when browser XHR/fetch adapters resolve XSRF config.lib/adapters/xhr.jsin0.x, when the XHR adapter reads the configured XSRF cookie.axios/unsafe/helpers/cookies.jsin1.x, if callers pass attacker-controlled names.Unaffected code paths:
xsrfCookieName: 'XSRF-TOKEN'when not attacker-controlled.xsrfCookieName: null.document.cookie.Technical Details
Affected versions interpolate the cookie name into a regex.
Because
nameis not escaped, regex metacharacters in the cookie name are interpreted as regex syntax. A payload such as(.+)+$can force catastrophic backtracking againstdocument.cookie.The fix avoids dynamic regex construction and parses
document.cookieby splitting on;, trimming leading whitespace, and comparing cookie names with exact string equality.Proof of Concept of Attack
Expected result: timings grow rapidly as the cookie string length increases.
Workarounds
Set
xsrfCookieName: nullif the application does not need axios to read an XSRF cookie.Do not derive
xsrfCookieNamefrom untrusted input. If a dynamic cookie name is unavoidable, validate it against a strict cookie-name allowlist before passing it to axios.Avoid calling
axios/unsafe/helpers/cookies.jsdirectly with untrusted namesOriginal Source
Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS) via Cookie Name Injection
1. Title
ReDoS via Unsanitized Cookie Name in Dynamic Regular Expression Construction
2. Affected Software and Version
lib/helpers/cookies.js3. Vulnerability Type / CWE
4. CVSS 3.1 Score
Score: 7.5 (High)
Vector:
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H5. Description
The
cookies.read()function inlib/helpers/cookies.jsconstructs a regular expression dynamically using thenameparameter without any sanitization or escaping of special regex characters. At line 33, the code passes the rawnamevalue directly intonew RegExp():An attacker who can control or influence the cookie name parameter (e.g., via XSRF cookie name configuration, prototype pollution of
xsrfCookieName, or any code path where user input reachescookies.read()) can inject a malicious regex pattern that causes catastrophic backtracking, leading to a Denial of Service condition.With a crafted input of approximately 20-30 characters, the regex engine can be forced to consume several seconds to minutes of CPU time, effectively freezing the JavaScript event loop.
6. Root Cause Analysis
File:
lib/helpers/cookies.jsLine: 33
The vulnerability exists because:
nameparameter is concatenated directly into a regex pattern without escaping special regex metacharacters.(?:^|; )prefix combined with an injected pattern like((((.*)*)*)*)*creates nested quantifiers that cause catastrophic backtracking when the regex engine attempts to match againstdocument.cookie.The
cookies.read()function is called fromlib/helpers/resolveConfig.jsat line 61:The
xsrfCookieNamevalue comes from the Axios configuration, which can be influenced by prototype pollution or direct configuration injection.7. Proof of Concept
8. PoC Output