Use timeout instead of num_sec with integer values

[mshriver]

preparation for wait_for v2

the timeout kwarg should be an integer, float, or timedelta instance.

Summary by Sourcery

Enhancements:

• Align wait_for invocation with the new timeout keyword argument instead of the deprecated num_sec parameter.

[sourcery-ai]

Reviewer's guide (collapsed on small PRs)

Reviewer's Guide

Replaces the deprecated num_sec argument with the new timeout argument in an internal wait_for call to prepare for wait_for v2 API changes.

Sequence diagram for internal wait_for timeout usage change

sequenceDiagram
    participant Browser
    participant wait_for

    Browser->>wait_for: _check_for_new_pages, timeout=1.0, delay=0.05, message, silent_failure
    wait_for-->>Browser: result

Loading

File-Level Changes

Change	Details	Files
Update internal wait_for invocation to use the new timeout parameter name.	Change the keyword argument from num_sec to timeout for a short wait_for call used when checking for new pages Preserve existing timeout value, delay, message, and silent_failure behavior while adapting to the upcoming wait_for v2 signature	src/widgetastic/browser.py

---

Tips and commands

Interacting with Sourcery

• Trigger a new review: Comment @sourcery-ai review on the pull request.
• Continue discussions: Reply directly to Sourcery's review comments.
• Generate a GitHub issue from a review comment: Ask Sourcery to create an
  issue from a review comment by replying to it. You can also reply to a
  review comment with @sourcery-ai issue to create an issue from it.
• Generate a pull request title: Write @sourcery-ai anywhere in the pull
  request title to generate a title at any time. You can also comment
  @sourcery-ai title on the pull request to (re-)generate the title at any time.
• Generate a pull request summary: Write @sourcery-ai summary anywhere in
  the pull request body to generate a PR summary at any time exactly where you
  want it. You can also comment @sourcery-ai summary on the pull request to
  (re-)generate the summary at any time.
• Generate reviewer's guide: Comment @sourcery-ai guide on the pull
  request to (re-)generate the reviewer's guide at any time.
• Resolve all Sourcery comments: Comment @sourcery-ai resolve on the
  pull request to resolve all Sourcery comments. Useful if you've already
  addressed all the comments and don't want to see them anymore.
• Dismiss all Sourcery reviews: Comment @sourcery-ai dismiss on the pull
  request to dismiss all existing Sourcery reviews. Especially useful if you
  want to start fresh with a new review - don't forget to comment
  @sourcery-ai review to trigger a new review!

Customizing Your Experience

Access your dashboard to:

• Enable or disable review features such as the Sourcery-generated pull request
  summary, the reviewer's guide, and others.
• Change the review language.
• Add, remove or edit custom review instructions.
• Adjust other review settings.

Getting Help

• Contact our support team for questions or feedback.
• Visit our documentation for detailed guides and information.
• Keep in touch with the Sourcery team by following us on X/Twitter, LinkedIn or GitHub.

[sourcery-ai]

Hey - I've reviewed your changes and they look great!

---

Sourcery is free for open source - if you like our reviews please consider sharing them ✨

• X
• Mastodon
• LinkedIn
• Facebook

_{Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment and I'll use the feedback to improve your reviews.}

[Copilot]

Pull request overview

This PR updates the wait_for usage in widgetastic.browser to use the timeout keyword argument instead of the deprecated num_sec, aligning the codebase with the upcoming wait_for v2 API.

Changes:

• Replaced num_sec=1.0 with timeout=1.0 in the short best-effort new-page detection wait.

---

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 92.72%. Comparing base (b3598bd) to head (dd259e1).

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #307   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   92.72%   92.72%           
=======================================
  Files          19       19           
  Lines        2750     2750           
=======================================
  Hits         2550     2550           
  Misses        200      200           

Flag	Coverage Δ
unittests	92.72% <100.00%> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

[Copilot]

Pull request overview

Copilot reviewed 6 out of 6 changed files in this pull request and generated 3 comments.

[swadeley]

ACK